Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Recital D — part 1

Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy

Vote
Recital D — part 1
Decision
No. 5 of the sitting of 12 Feb 2026
Result
426 for · 72 against · 82 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
12 February 2026, 12:23
More facts (6)
Position
vote 21 of 27 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · split vote: Members
Official label
A10-0260/2025 – João Oliveira – Recital D/1
Text
Report A-10-2025-0260
Dossier
2025/2095(INI)
Vote id
184780
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 426 for, 72 against, 82 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 73 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘a more equitable distribution of wealth,’”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 39Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 109Against 0Abst. 0No vote 27 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 58Against 4Abst. 0No vote 13 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.90
EPPFor 144Against 1Abst. 0No vote 42 of 187Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 15Against 10Abst. 38No vote 16 of 79Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.40
PatriotsFor 0Against 30Abst. 40No vote 14 of 84Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.36
ESNFor 0Against 24Abst. 1No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 18Against 3Abst. 3No vote 8 of 32Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium400
Bulgaria300
Germany410
Denmark400
Estonia200
Spain100
Finland300
France1000
Ireland400
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Netherlands700
Poland100
Portugal020
Romania300
Sweden110
Slovenia200
Slovakia400

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 580 members

No vote recorded, 139

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 139 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 13 — part 4 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote462 for, 101 against, 63 abstained Adopted For 74 %r · shared0.84 517 voters
1 Apr 2025Final vote Re-attribution of scientific and technical tasks to the European Chemicals AgencyFinal482 for, 110 against, 81 abstained Adopted For 72 %r · shared0.84 544 voters
20 May 2026Paragraph 1, point af — part 2 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblySplit vote482 for, 132 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 77 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.83 508 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 Jul 2025Wednesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left GroupOther308 for, 101 against, 0 abstained Adopted For 75 %r · shared0.83 337 voters
27 Nov 2025Paragraph 22 — part 4 Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in SudanSplit vote405 for, 68 against, 115 abstained Adopted For 69 %r · shared0.83 488 voters
11 Mar 2026Final vote on the draft Council decision Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of LawFinal455 for, 101 against, 74 abstained Adopted For 72 %r · shared0.83 527 voters
17 Dec 2025Paragraph 16 — part 2 Digitalisation, artificial intelligence and algorithmic management in the workplace – shaping the future of workSplit vote471 for, 137 against, 49 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.83 546 voters
19 Jun 2025Paragraph 21 — part 2 Electricity grids: the backbone of the EU energy systemSplit vote405 for, 163 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renew, Greensr · shared0.83 483 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point h — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote386 for, 120 against, 61 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.83 564 voters
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 32 — part 2 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldSplit vote482 for, 67 against, 121 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.83 542 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184780
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Recital D — part 1 — Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy”. Vote, 12 February 2026. votingId 184780, reference 2025/2095(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184780 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-02-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-02-12-184780,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Recital D — part 1 — Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-02-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184780}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184780},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 184780, reference 2025/2095(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}