Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 8, after paragraph 47

Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy

Vote
Amendment 8, after paragraph 47
Result
291 for · 238 against · 50 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
12 February 2026, 12:22
More facts (6)
Position
vote 13 of 27 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: EPP, Members
Official label
A10-0260/2025 – João Oliveira – After § 47 – Am 8
Vote id
184772
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 291 for, 238 against, 50 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 50 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 39Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 101Against 3Abst. 5No vote 27 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.89
RenewFor 46Against 15Abst. 1No vote 13 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.61
EPPFor 33Against 105Abst. 5No vote 44 of 187Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.60
ECRFor 4Against 38Abst. 21No vote 16 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.40
PatriotsFor 9Against 47Abst. 14No vote 14 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.51
ESNFor 1Against 23Abst. 1No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
No groupFor 15Against 7Abst. 3No vote 7 of 32Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria100
Belgium200
Czechia100
Germany1300
Denmark300
Spain400
Finland100
France400
Croatia100
Italy300
Lithuania100
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands400
Sweden300

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 579 members

No vote recorded, 140

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 140 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
11 Mar 2026Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 3 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026Amendment313 for, 270 against, 49 abstained Adopted For 50 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.91 525 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 106, adding text after paragraph 50 — part 2 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAmendment323 for, 247 against, 41 abstained Adopted For 53 %Requested by EPP, S&Dr · shared0.86 501 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 12 Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth GuaranteeAmendment336 for, 266 against, 63 abstained Adopted For 51 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.86 537 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Mar 2025Paragraph 31 — part 4 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025Split vote339 for, 325 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 50 %r · shared0.84 541 voters
12 Mar 2025Paragraph 17 — part 3 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025Split vote317 for, 343 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 47 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.83 532 voters
12 Mar 2025Paragraph 24 — part 2 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025Split vote338 for, 278 against, 59 abstained Adopted For 50 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.83 535 voters
21 May 2026Paragraph 37 — part 2 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapSplit vote245 for, 275 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by Members, S&Dr · shared0.83 454 voters
13 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 86 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Separate vote273 for, 324 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.81 511 voters
13 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 68 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Separate vote262 for, 309 against, 33 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by Renew, S&Dr · shared0.81 501 voters
12 Mar 2025Paragraph 29 — part 2 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025Split vote334 for, 247 against, 98 abstained Adopted For 49 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.81 540 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 8, after paragraph 47 — Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy”. Vote, 12 February 2026. votingId 184772, reference 2025/2095(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184772 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-02-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-02-12-184772,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 8, after paragraph 47 — Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-02-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184772}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184772},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 184772, reference 2025/2095(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}