Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 22 — part 2

Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy

Vote
Paragraph 22 — part 2
Result
276 for · 262 against · 36 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
12 February 2026, 12:21
More facts (6)
Position
vote 9 of 27 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left, S&D · split vote: Members
Official label
A10-0260/2025 – João Oliveira – § 22/2
Vote id
184768
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 276 for, 262 against, 36 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 48 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “those words”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 39Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 103Against 0Abst. 5No vote 28 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
RenewFor 42Against 19Abst. 2No vote 12 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.50
EPPFor 29Against 109Abst. 2No vote 47 of 187Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.67
ECRFor 2Against 44Abst. 17No vote 16 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.55
PatriotsFor 0Against 61Abst. 9No vote 14 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.81
ESNFor 0Against 23Abst. 1No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 18Against 6Abst. 0No vote 8 of 32Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria050
Belgium020
Czechia070
Denmark010
Spain060
France0230
Hungary009
Italy070
Latvia010
Netherlands060
Poland020
Portugal010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 574 members

No vote recorded, 145

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 145 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Mar 2025Paragraph 17 — part 3 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025Split vote317 for, 343 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 47 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.86 527 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 8 — part 2 Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rightsSplit vote246 for, 318 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.85 567 voters
11 Mar 2026Paragraph 17 — part 3 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026Split vote282 for, 335 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.84 523 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Dec 2025Annex, paragraph 1 — part 2 Digitalisation, artificial intelligence and algorithmic management in the workplace – shaping the future of workSplit vote278 for, 374 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 42 %r · shared0.83 539 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 19 — part 2 Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rightsSplit vote258 for, 290 against, 28 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.83 567 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 4 — part 2 Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rightsSplit vote250 for, 310 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.83 567 voters
12 Mar 2025Paragraph 31 — part 3 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025Split vote311 for, 367 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.82 538 voters
17 Jun 2025Separate vote on paragraph 20 Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in SevilleSeparate vote281 for, 361 against, 21 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.82 529 voters
27 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 26 EU strategy for the rights of persons with disabilities post-2024Separate vote299 for, 237 against, 73 abstained Adopted For 49 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.82 500 voters
12 Mar 2025Paragraph 31 — part 4 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025Split vote339 for, 325 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 50 %r · shared0.82 536 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
29 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 22 — part 2 — Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy”. Vote, 12 February 2026. votingId 184768, reference 2025/2095(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184768 (retrieved 29 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-02-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-02-12-184768,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 22 — part 2 — Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-02-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184768}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184768},
  urldate = {2026-09-29},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 184768, reference 2025/2095(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}