Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 22 — part 1

Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy

Vote
Paragraph 22 — part 1
Result
377 for · 166 against · 35 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
12 February 2026, 12:21
More facts (6)
Position
vote 8 of 27 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · split vote: Members
Official label
A10-0260/2025 – João Oliveira – § 22/1
Vote id
184767
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 377 for, 166 against, 35 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 65 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘calls for this plan to dedicate robust EU funding to the expansion and renovation of public and social housing stock;’”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 39Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 42Against 0Abst. 0No vote 11 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 109Against 0Abst. 0No vote 27 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 48Against 11Abst. 4No vote 12 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.64
EPPFor 120Against 7Abst. 17No vote 43 of 187Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.75
ECRFor 3Against 56Abst. 2No vote 18 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
PatriotsFor 0Against 61Abst. 9No vote 14 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.81
ESNFor 0Against 24Abst. 1No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 16Against 7Abst. 2No vote 7 of 32Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium103
Bulgaria300
Germany140
Denmark220
Estonia101
Spain100
Finland300
France1100
Ireland400
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Netherlands700
Poland100
Portugal020
Romania300
Sweden110
Slovenia200
Slovakia400

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 578 members

No vote recorded, 141

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 141 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 Jan 2026Final vote — text as a whole Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economiesFinal420 for, 207 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.87 537 voters
23 Oct 2024Final vote Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member StatesFinal444 for, 179 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 69 %r · shared0.87 510 voters
19 Jun 2025Paragraph 13 — part 2 Electricity grids: the backbone of the EU energy systemSplit vote403 for, 168 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.87 481 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 33 — part 5 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote443 for, 153 against, 23 abstained Adopted For 72 %r · shared0.87 510 voters
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 33 — part 4 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote451 for, 165 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 72 %r · shared0.87 516 voters
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 34 — part 2 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote449 for, 163 against, 13 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.87 515 voters
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 33 — part 6 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote428 for, 151 against, 13 abstained Adopted For 72 %r · shared0.86 489 voters
9 Oct 2025Paragraph 4 — part 2 Second World Summit for Social DevelopmentSplit vote415 for, 177 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.86 502 voters
10 Mar 2026Recital N — part 2 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote443 for, 161 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.86 512 voters
21 May 2026Paragraph 18 — part 2 The need to reduce work-related fatalitiesSplit vote303 for, 165 against, 5 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by The Left, Patriotsr · shared0.86 401 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
27 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 22 — part 1 — Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy”. Vote, 12 February 2026. votingId 184767, reference 2025/2095(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184767 (retrieved 27 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-02-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-02-12-184767,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 22 — part 1 — Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-02-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184767}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184767},
  urldate = {2026-09-27},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 184767, reference 2025/2095(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}