Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 4, after paragraph 5

Brutal repression against protesters in Iran

Vote
Amendment 4, after paragraph 5
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 22 Jan 2026
Result
224 for · 381 against · 18 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
22 January 2026, 12:13
More facts (6)
Position
vote 10 of 26 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens
Official label
RC-B10-0071/2026 – After § 5 – Am 4
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0095
Dossier
2026/2565(RSP)
Vote id
184023
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 224 for, 381 against, 18 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 36 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 37Against 1Abst. 0No vote 8 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 49Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 105Against 3Abst. 4No vote 24 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.91
RenewFor 18Against 46Abst. 0No vote 11 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.58
EPPFor 2Against 163Abst. 1No vote 21 of 187Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
ECRFor 0Against 61Abst. 2No vote 16 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.95
PatriotsFor 6Against 72Abst. 0No vote 8 of 86Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
ESNFor 1Against 23Abst. 1No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
No groupFor 6Against 12Abst. 10No vote 2 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria020
Cyprus100
Czechia020
Germany207
France010
Greece310
Luxembourg001
Romania011
Slovakia051

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 623 members

No vote recorded, 96

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 96 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Amendment 4 to paragraph 10 Systemic oppression, inhumane conditions and arbitrary detentions by the regime in IranAmendment193 for, 348 against, 25 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.92 514 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 5 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment201 for, 390 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.92 526 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.91 518 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 10 Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefireAmendment177 for, 338 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.90 479 voters
12 Feb 2026Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 10 Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefireAmendment180 for, 332 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.90 483 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 2 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment203 for, 390 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.90 526 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.90 523 voters
27 Nov 2025Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 9 Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in SudanAmendment200 for, 384 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 34 %r · shared0.89 526 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 60, adding text after recital C The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 516 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 69 to paragraph 13 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 516 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-22/184023
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 4, after paragraph 5 — Brutal repression against protesters in Iran”. Vote, 22 January 2026. votingId 184023, reference 2026/2565(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-22/184023 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 22 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-22-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 22 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-22-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-22, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-01-22/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-01-22-184023,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 4, after paragraph 5 — Brutal repression against protesters in Iran}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-01-22},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-22/184023}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-22/184023},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 184023, reference 2026/2565(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-22-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-22-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-22 (CC BY 4.0)}
}