Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Separate vote: citation 2

The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies

Vote
Separate vote: citation 2
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 20 Jan 2026
Result
491 for · 139 against · 20 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
20 January 2026, 12:57
More facts (6)
Position
vote 33 of 36 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
A10-0269/2025 – René Repasi – Citation 2
Text
Report A-10-2025-0269
Dossier
2025/2079(INL)
Vote id
183525
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 491 for, 139 against, 20 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 76 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 28Against 7Abst. 2No vote 9 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.64
GreensFor 46Against 3Abst. 1No vote 3 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
S&DFor 119Against 5Abst. 0No vote 12 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
RenewFor 65Against 3Abst. 0No vote 7 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
EPPFor 166Against 6Abst. 2No vote 14 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
ECRFor 56Against 5Abst. 11No vote 7 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.67
PatriotsFor 0Against 76Abst. 0No vote 9 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 23Abst. 1No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 11Against 11Abst. 3No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria200
Cyprus100
Czechia110
Germany251
France100
Greece012
Luxembourg010
Romania100
Slovakia330

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 650 members

No vote recorded, 69

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 69 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 Jul 2025Paragraph 49 — part 3 Security of energy supply in the EUSplit vote535 for, 122 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.83 608 voters
7 May 2025Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Council and CouncilFinal526 for, 119 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.83 602 voters
8 Jul 2025Recital I — part 2 Security of energy supply in the EUSplit vote524 for, 128 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.82 609 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Amendment 133 to Article 6 — part 1 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment505 for, 126 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.82 599 voters
7 May 2025Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2023: AgenciesFinal503 for, 121 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 77 %r · shared0.82 588 voters
7 May 2025Final vote Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European ParliamentFinal513 for, 119 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.82 588 voters
7 May 2025Final vote Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European External Action ServiceFinal519 for, 126 against, 16 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.82 597 voters
30 Apr 2026Paragraph 14 — part 2 Supporting democratic resilience in ArmeniaSplit vote445 for, 98 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 79 %Requested by Patriots, ESNr · shared0.82 509 voters
10 Mar 2026Separate vote on paragraph 32 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSeparate vote483 for, 106 against, 32 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.80 575 voters
9 Jul 2025Final vote — text as a whole 2023 and 2024 reports on Bosnia and HerzegovinaFinal495 for, 130 against, 63 abstained Adopted For 72 %r · shared0.80 619 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183525
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Separate vote: citation 2 — The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies”. Vote, 20 January 2026. votingId 183525, reference 2025/2079(INL). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183525 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 20 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 20 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-20, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-01-20/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-01-20-183525,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Separate vote: citation 2 — The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-01-20},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183525}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183525},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 183525, reference 2025/2079(INL). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-20 (CC BY 4.0)}
}