Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 32, after recital E

The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies

Vote
Amendment 32, after recital E
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 20 Jan 2026
Result
190 for · 450 against · 13 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
20 January 2026, 12:57
More facts (6)
Position
vote 35 of 36 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
A10-0269/2025 – René Repasi – After recital E – Am 32
Text
Report A-10-2025-0269
Dossier
2025/2079(INL)
Vote id
183500
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 190 for, 450 against, 13 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 29 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 2Against 36Abst. 0No vote 8 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.92
GreensFor 0Against 50Abst. 1No vote 2 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 0Against 127Abst. 0No vote 9 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 1Against 65Abst. 1No vote 8 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
EPPFor 3Against 167Abst. 4No vote 14 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
ECRFor 66Against 0Abst. 5No vote 8 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.89
PatriotsFor 79Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 23Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 16Against 5Abst. 2No vote 7 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria100
Cyprus010
Czechia200
Germany521
France010
Greece101
Luxembourg100
Romania100
Slovakia510

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 653 members

No vote recorded, 66

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 66 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Dec 2025Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 20 Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regimeAmendment179 for, 396 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 550 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 19 Discharge 2024: AgenciesAmendment200 for, 432 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 585 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 72, adding text after paragraph 39 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Amendment186 for, 446 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 597 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 12 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment193 for, 428 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.97 573 voters
15 Dec 2025Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the ESN Group (Australia and Bavaria) Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the ESN Group (Australia and Bavaria)Other130 for, 316 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %r · shared0.97 418 voters
11 Mar 2026Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 24 European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026Amendment184 for, 441 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 586 voters
7 Jul 2026Amendment 4 to paragraph 10 A new strategy for media literacy and digital learningAmendment191 for, 455 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.97 596 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 1 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAmendment193 for, 431 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 582 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 237 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment200 for, 440 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 594 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 12 to paragraph 19 Discharge 2024: AgenciesAmendment199 for, 429 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 580 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183500
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 32, after recital E — The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies”. Vote, 20 January 2026. votingId 183500, reference 2025/2079(INL). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183500 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 20 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 20 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-20, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-01-20/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-01-20-183500,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 32, after recital E — The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-01-20},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183500}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183500},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 183500, reference 2025/2079(INL). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-20 (CC BY 4.0)}
}