Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 27 to paragraph 41

The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies

Vote
Amendment 27 to paragraph 41
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 20 Jan 2026
Result
162 for · 484 against · 18 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
20 January 2026, 12:56
More facts (6)
Position
vote 31 of 36 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
A10-0269/2025 – René Repasi – § 41 – Am 27D
Text
Report A-10-2025-0269
Dossier
2025/2079(INL)
Vote id
183496
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 162 for, 484 against, 18 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 24 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 38Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 2Against 48Abst. 0No vote 3 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
S&DFor 0Against 126Abst. 0No vote 10 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 68Abst. 0No vote 7 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 0Against 181Abst. 0No vote 7 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 18Against 47Abst. 7No vote 7 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.48
PatriotsFor 70Against 7Abst. 2No vote 6 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.83
ESNFor 20Against 2Abst. 2No vote 3 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.75
No groupFor 14Against 5Abst. 7No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria600
Belgium200
Czechia701
Denmark100
Spain510
France2800
Greece100
Hungary1000
Italy700
Latvia100
Netherlands060
Poland200
Portugal001

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 664 members

No vote recorded, 55

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 55 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Jul 2025Final vote on the motion for a resolution Motion of censure on the CommissionFinal175 for, 360 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 32 %r · shared0.82 511 voters
18 Dec 2024Amendment 4 to paragraph 4, point 2, paragraph 4 Amendment of Annex VI – Powers and responsibilities of the standing committeesAmendment173 for, 459 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 595 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 91, adding text after paragraph 25 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment137 for, 478 against, 62 abstained Rejected For 20 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 620 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Feb 2025Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 1 Further deterioration of the political situation in GeorgiaAmendment142 for, 405 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 513 voters
9 Jul 2025Amendment 1 to paragraph 1 2023 and 2024 reports on GeorgiaAmendment154 for, 513 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 23 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 618 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 90, adding text after paragraph 25 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment143 for, 478 against, 60 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 623 voters
22 Oct 2025Amendment 167, adding text after paragraph 75 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment115 for, 471 against, 47 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 588 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 6 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAmendment155 for, 435 against, 80 abstained Rejected For 23 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 615 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 32 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAmendment168 for, 447 against, 46 abstained Rejected For 25 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 608 voters
9 Jul 2025Amendment 4 to paragraph 23 2023 and 2024 reports on GeorgiaAmendment141 for, 531 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.80 633 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183496
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 27 to paragraph 41 — The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies”. Vote, 20 January 2026. votingId 183496, reference 2025/2079(INL). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183496 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 20 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 20 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-20, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-01-20/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-01-20-183496,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 27 to paragraph 41 — The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-01-20},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183496}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183496},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 183496, reference 2025/2079(INL). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-20 (CC BY 4.0)}
}