Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 35 to paragraph 40

The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies

Vote
Amendment 35 to paragraph 40
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 20 Jan 2026
Result
124 for · 500 against · 28 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
20 January 2026, 12:56
More facts (6)
Position
vote 30 of 36 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
A10-0269/2025 – René Repasi – § 40 – Am 35
Text
Report A-10-2025-0269
Dossier
2025/2079(INL)
Vote id
183495
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 124 for, 500 against, 28 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 19 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 2Against 34Abst. 2No vote 8 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.84
GreensFor 0Against 51Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 125Abst. 0No vote 11 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 67Abst. 1No vote 7 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 0Against 172Abst. 1No vote 15 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 16Against 38Abst. 17No vote 8 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.30
PatriotsFor 71Against 6Abst. 1No vote 7 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.87
ESNFor 24Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 11Against 7Abst. 6No vote 6 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria020
Cyprus010
Czechia200
Germany125
France010
Greece200
Luxembourg010
Romania100
Slovakia501

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 652 members

No vote recorded, 67

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 67 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 May 2025Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 5 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Data Protection SupervisorAmendment118 for, 507 against, 33 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.94 598 voters
7 Jul 2026Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 5 Financial activities of the European Investment Bank Group – annual report 2025Amendment116 for, 502 against, 38 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.91 597 voters
10 Feb 2026Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 8 European Central Bank – annual report 2025Amendment116 for, 501 against, 27 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.90 608 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 May 2026Amendment 4, adding text after recital I EU-Uzbekistan Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (resolution)Amendment122 for, 454 against, 75 abstained Rejected For 19 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.90 595 voters
18 Jun 2026Proposal to reject the text Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesRejection108 for, 436 against, 24 abstained Rejected For 19 %r · shared0.90 515 voters
7 Jul 2026Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 6 Financial activities of the European Investment Bank Group – annual report 2025Amendment139 for, 498 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.90 597 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 44 to paragraph 28 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment97 for, 525 against, 57 abstained Rejected For 14 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.90 612 voters
22 Jan 2026Final vote on the motion for a resolution Motion of censure on the CommissionFinal165 for, 390 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 29 %r · shared0.89 549 voters
30 Apr 2026Amendment 3 to paragraph 6 Escalating trafficking and exploitation by criminal groups in HaitiAmendment99 for, 427 against, 40 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.89 513 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 5, adding text after recital A The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportAmendment165 for, 464 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by S&D, Membersr · shared0.89 594 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183495
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 35 to paragraph 40 — The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies”. Vote, 20 January 2026. votingId 183495, reference 2025/2079(INL). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183495 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 20 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 20 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-20, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-01-20/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-01-20-183495,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 35 to paragraph 40 — The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-01-20},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183495}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183495},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 183495, reference 2025/2079(INL). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-20 (CC BY 4.0)}
}