Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 26 to paragraph 40

The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies

Vote
Amendment 26 to paragraph 40
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 20 Jan 2026
Result
136 for · 487 against · 24 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
20 January 2026, 12:56
More facts (6)
Position
vote 29 of 36 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
A10-0269/2025 – René Repasi – § 40 – Am 26D
Text
Report A-10-2025-0269
Dossier
2025/2079(INL)
Vote id
183494
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 136 for, 487 against, 24 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 21 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 34Against 0Abst. 1No vote 11 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 0Against 46Abst. 5No vote 2 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.85
S&DFor 0Against 125Abst. 0No vote 11 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 64Abst. 0No vote 11 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 0Against 178Abst. 0No vote 10 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 11Against 59Abst. 1No vote 8 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.75
PatriotsFor 56Against 9Abst. 13No vote 7 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.58
ESNFor 20Against 2Abst. 1No vote 4 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.80
No groupFor 15Against 4Abst. 3No vote 8 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria006
Belgium020
Czechia116
Denmark100
Spain500
France2800
Greece100
Hungary1000
Italy700
Latvia100
Netherlands060
Poland200
Portugal001

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 647 members

No vote recorded, 72

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 72 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Feb 2025Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 1 Further deterioration of the political situation in GeorgiaAmendment142 for, 405 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.86 500 voters
28 Nov 2024Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 1 Georgia's worsening democratic crisis following the recent parliamentary elections and alleged electoral fraudAmendment110 for, 451 against, 43 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.85 545 voters
9 Jul 2025Amendment 1 to paragraph 1 2023 and 2024 reports on GeorgiaAmendment154 for, 513 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 23 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.84 603 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Jul 2025Amendment 4 to paragraph 23 2023 and 2024 reports on GeorgiaAmendment141 for, 531 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.83 617 voters
19 Sept 2024Amendment 22, adding text after paragraph 10 Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member StatesAmendment151 for, 429 against, 37 abstained Rejected For 24 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.83 553 voters
18 Dec 2024Amendment 4 to paragraph 4, point 2, paragraph 4 Amendment of Annex VI – Powers and responsibilities of the standing committeesAmendment173 for, 459 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 582 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 91, adding text after paragraph 25 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment137 for, 478 against, 62 abstained Rejected For 20 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 608 voters
14 Nov 2024Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 2 EU actions against the Russian shadow fleets and ensuring a full enforcement of sanctions against RussiaAmendment116 for, 483 against, 36 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 569 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 90, adding text after paragraph 25 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment143 for, 478 against, 60 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 610 voters
25 Mar 2026Wednesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group — Australia Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group – AustraliaOther134 for, 350 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 27 %r · shared0.80 452 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183494
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 26 to paragraph 40 — The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies”. Vote, 20 January 2026. votingId 183494, reference 2025/2079(INL). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183494 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 20 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 20 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-20, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-01-20/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-01-20-183494,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 26 to paragraph 40 — The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-01-20},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183494}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183494},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 183494, reference 2025/2079(INL). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-20 (CC BY 4.0)}
}