Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendments 25 + 34 (voted as one) to paragraph 37

The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies

Vote
Amendments 25 + 34 (voted as one) to paragraph 37
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 20 Jan 2026
Result
191 for · 423 against · 48 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
20 January 2026, 12:55
More facts (6)
Position
vote 28 of 36 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
A10-0269/2025 – René Repasi – § 37 – Am 25D= 34D=
Text
Report A-10-2025-0269
Dossier
2025/2079(INL)
Vote id
183493
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 191 for, 423 against, 48 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 29 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 36Against 0Abst. 1No vote 9 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 2Against 9Abst. 40No vote 2 of 53Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.68
S&DFor 0Against 125Abst. 0No vote 11 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 69Abst. 0No vote 6 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 7Against 174Abst. 0No vote 7 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
ECRFor 26Against 39Abst. 5No vote 9 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.34
PatriotsFor 79Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 22Against 2Abst. 0No vote 3 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
No groupFor 19Against 5Abst. 2No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria002
Belgium002
Czechia001
Germany0510
Denmark102
Spain004
Finland002
France103
Croatia001
Italy004
Lithuania010
Luxembourg001
Latvia001
Netherlands024
Romania001
Sweden002
Slovenia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 662 members

No vote recorded, 57

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 57 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Jul 2025Final vote on the motion for a resolution Motion of censure on the CommissionFinal175 for, 360 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 32 %r · shared0.85 510 voters
25 Mar 2026Wednesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group — Australia Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group – AustraliaOther134 for, 350 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 27 %r · shared0.85 461 voters
22 Jan 2026Final vote on the motion for a resolution Motion of censure on the CommissionFinal165 for, 390 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 29 %r · shared0.82 552 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
2 Apr 2025Amendment 91, adding text after paragraph 25 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment137 for, 478 against, 62 abstained Rejected For 20 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 620 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 90, adding text after paragraph 25 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment143 for, 478 against, 60 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 623 voters
18 Dec 2024Amendment 4 to paragraph 4, point 2, paragraph 4 Amendment of Annex VI – Powers and responsibilities of the standing committeesAmendment173 for, 459 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.79 594 voters
10 Feb 2026Proposal to vote on amendments Bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural productsProcedural206 for, 430 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 32 %r · shared0.79 614 voters
17 Jun 2026Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 1 2025 Commission report on GeorgiaAmendment159 for, 396 against, 90 abstained Rejected For 25 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.79 594 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 3 Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s OfficeAmendment209 for, 413 against, 38 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.78 608 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 26 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Amendment254 for, 359 against, 44 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.78 609 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183493
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendments 25 + 34 (voted as one) to paragraph 37 — The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies”. Vote, 20 January 2026. votingId 183493, reference 2025/2079(INL). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183493 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 20 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 20 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-20, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-01-20/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-01-20-183493,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendments 25 + 34 (voted as one) to paragraph 37 — The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-01-20},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183493}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183493},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 183493, reference 2025/2079(INL). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-20 (CC BY 4.0)}
}