Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 21, after paragraph 29

The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies

Vote
Amendment 21, after paragraph 29
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 20 Jan 2026
Result
79 for · 561 against · 15 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
20 January 2026, 12:55
More facts (6)
Position
vote 24 of 36 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
A10-0269/2025 – René Repasi – After § 29 – Am 21
Text
Report A-10-2025-0269
Dossier
2025/2079(INL)
Vote id
183492
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 79 for, 561 against, 15 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 12 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 35Against 2Abst. 2No vote 7 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.85
GreensFor 16Against 35Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.53
S&DFor 4Against 108Abst. 3No vote 21 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.91
RenewFor 0Against 69Abst. 0No vote 6 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 0Against 180Abst. 1No vote 7 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 4Against 66Abst. 1No vote 8 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.89
PatriotsFor 0Against 73Abst. 6No vote 6 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.89
ESNFor 1Against 23Abst. 0No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 19Against 5Abst. 2No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

S&D members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria050
Belgium120
Bulgaria020
Cyprus010
Germany0130
Denmark020
Estonia020
Spain0170
Finland020
France010
Greece030
Croatia103
Hungary200
Ireland010
Italy0200
Lithuania010
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Malta030
Netherlands040
Poland030
Portugal080
Romania0110
Sweden040
Slovenia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 655 members

No vote recorded, 64

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 64 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
23 Oct 2024Amendment 7, adding text before paragraph 1 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sectionsAmendment78 for, 554 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 12 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.85 586 voters
23 Jan 2025Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 5 Case of Boualem Sansal in AlgeriaAmendment62 for, 540 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 10 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.84 556 voters
12 Mar 2025Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 2 White paper on the future of European defenceAmendment78 for, 582 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 12 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.84 612 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Dec 2024Amendment 9 to recital D Setting up a Special Committee on the Housing Crisis in the European Union, and defining its responsibilities, numerical strength and term of officeAmendment77 for, 520 against, 52 abstained Rejected For 12 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.83 591 voters
11 Mar 2026Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 30 European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026Amendment70 for, 506 against, 56 abstained Rejected For 11 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 586 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 26, adding text after paragraph 16 Clean Industrial DealAmendment70 for, 476 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 13 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 510 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 294 to Article 13, paragraph 3, après le point c Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment63 for, 504 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 11 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 527 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 33 to paragraph 55 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Amendment75 for, 566 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 12 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 598 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 16 Clean Industrial DealAmendment74 for, 478 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 13 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 520 voters
26 Mar 2026Amendment 50, adding text after recital 1 Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of AmericaAmendment65 for, 526 against, 48 abstained Rejected For 10 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 590 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183492
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 21, after paragraph 29 — The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies”. Vote, 20 January 2026. votingId 183492, reference 2025/2079(INL). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183492 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 20 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 20 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-20, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-01-20/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-01-20-183492,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 21, after paragraph 29 — The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-01-20},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183492}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183492},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 183492, reference 2025/2079(INL). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-20 (CC BY 4.0)}
}