Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 11, after paragraph 14

The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies

Vote
Amendment 11, after paragraph 14
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 20 Jan 2026
Result
78 for · 528 against · 58 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
20 January 2026, 12:54
More facts (6)
Position
vote 14 of 36 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
A10-0269/2025 – René Repasi – After § 14 – Am 11
Text
Report A-10-2025-0269
Dossier
2025/2079(INL)
Vote id
183490
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 78 for, 528 against, 58 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 12 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 38Against 0Abst. 1No vote 7 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 15Against 2Abst. 34No vote 2 of 53Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.50
S&DFor 5Against 104Abst. 17No vote 10 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.74
RenewFor 2Against 65Abst. 0No vote 8 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
EPPFor 0Against 181Abst. 0No vote 7 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 0Against 70Abst. 1No vote 8 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 1Against 75Abst. 3No vote 6 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.92
ESNFor 1Against 21Abst. 2No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.81
No groupFor 16Against 10Abst. 0No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium030
Bulgaria030
Germany070
Denmark040
Estonia020
Spain010
Finland030
France0120
Ireland060
Lithuania020
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands070
Poland010
Romania030
Sweden030
Slovenia200
Slovakia040

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 664 members

No vote recorded, 55

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 55 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
26 Mar 2026Amendment 50, adding text after recital 1 Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of AmericaAmendment65 for, 526 against, 48 abstained Rejected For 10 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.90 596 voters
18 Dec 2024Amendment 9 to recital D Setting up a Special Committee on the Housing Crisis in the European Union, and defining its responsibilities, numerical strength and term of officeAmendment77 for, 520 against, 52 abstained Rejected For 12 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.85 599 voters
11 Mar 2026Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 30 European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026Amendment70 for, 506 against, 56 abstained Rejected For 11 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.85 591 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 Jul 2026Amendment 37 to paragraph 54 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment123 for, 536 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.85 611 voters
7 Jul 2026Amendment 6 to paragraph 2, point h Special Committee on the Housing Crisis in the European Union: extending its term of office and adjusting its responsibilitiesAmendment112 for, 529 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 606 voters
10 Jul 2025Amendment 4 to paragraph 8 Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictionsAmendment88 for, 520 against, 22 abstained Rejected For 14 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 583 voters
27 Nov 2025Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 9 Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in SudanAmendment94 for, 475 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 16 %r · shared0.81 555 voters
23 Oct 2024Amendment 7, adding text before paragraph 1 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sectionsAmendment78 for, 554 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 12 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 594 voters
21 May 2025Request by The Left Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left GroupOther102 for, 378 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 21 %r · shared0.81 450 voters
18 Dec 2024Amendment 8 to recital B Setting up a Special Committee on the Housing Crisis in the European Union, and defining its responsibilities, numerical strength and term of officeAmendment118 for, 495 against, 27 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 590 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183490
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 11, after paragraph 14 — The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies”. Vote, 20 January 2026. votingId 183490, reference 2025/2079(INL). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183490 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 20 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 20 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-20, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-01-20/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-01-20-183490,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 11, after paragraph 14 — The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-01-20},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183490}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183490},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 183490, reference 2025/2079(INL). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-20 (CC BY 4.0)}
}