Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 29, after paragraph 10

The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies

Vote
Amendment 29, after paragraph 10
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 20 Jan 2026
Result
135 for · 471 against · 52 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
20 January 2026, 12:53
More facts (6)
Position
vote 10 of 36 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN
Official label
A10-0269/2025 – René Repasi – After § 10 – Am 29
Text
Report A-10-2025-0269
Dossier
2025/2079(INL)
Vote id
183489
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 135 for, 471 against, 52 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 21 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 39Abst. 0No vote 7 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 51Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 2Against 122Abst. 0No vote 12 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
RenewFor 1Against 63Abst. 2No vote 9 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
EPPFor 1Against 176Abst. 1No vote 10 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
ECRFor 71Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 32Against 0Abst. 47No vote 6 of 85Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.39
ESNFor 23Against 1Abst. 0No vote 3 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 5Against 19Abst. 2No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria110
Cyprus010
Czechia002
Germany170
France010
Greece130
Luxembourg100
Romania100
Slovakia060

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 658 members

No vote recorded, 61

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 61 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
11 Mar 2026Amendment 19 to recital B European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026Amendment176 for, 446 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 582 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 7 to recital AY The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forwardAmendment175 for, 378 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.92 513 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 6 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Amendment192 for, 441 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.91 590 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
26 Mar 2026Amendment 89 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment189 for, 438 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 587 voters
26 Nov 2025Amendment 1 to recital E Draft amending budget No 3/2025: adjustment in payment appropriations, update of revenues and other technical updatesAmendment184 for, 458 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 614 voters
22 Oct 2025Amendment 1 to recital A Discharge 2023: AgenciesAmendment180 for, 449 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.91 588 voters
22 May 2025Amendment 23, adding text after recital 27 Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanismAmendment172 for, 405 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 532 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 1 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Amendment172 for, 440 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.91 579 voters
10 Mar 2026Proposal to vote on amendments Harmonising certain aspects of insolvency lawProcedural164 for, 447 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 27 %r · shared0.91 573 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 1 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUAmendment180 for, 455 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriots, S&D, Renewr · shared0.91 600 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183489
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 29, after paragraph 10 — The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies”. Vote, 20 January 2026. votingId 183489, reference 2025/2079(INL). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183489 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 20 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 20 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-20, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-01-20/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-01-20-183489,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 29, after paragraph 10 — The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-01-20},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183489}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183489},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 183489, reference 2025/2079(INL). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-20 (CC BY 4.0)}
}