Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 7 — part 2 to paragraph 10

The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies

Vote
Amendment 7 — part 2 to paragraph 10
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 20 Jan 2026
Result
103 for · 500 against · 61 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
20 January 2026, 12:53
More facts (6)
Position
vote 9 of 36 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots · split vote: Patriots
Official label
A10-0269/2025 – René Repasi – § 10 – Am 7/2
Text
Report A-10-2025-0269
Dossier
2025/2079(INL)
Vote id
183488
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 103 for, 500 against, 61 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 16 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “in that regard, considers that the proposal on the 28th regime should be accompanied by additional measures, such as a social non-regression clause, in order to avoid the circumvention or weakening of more protective social rules applicable in the country of origin; insists that strong and effective safeguards be set out by way of substantive rules which have a high level of protection;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 39Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 16Against 1Abst. 34No vote 2 of 53Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.50
S&DFor 28Against 97Abst. 0No vote 11 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.66
RenewFor 0Against 67Abst. 0No vote 8 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 0Against 181Abst. 0No vote 7 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 0Against 70Abst. 2No vote 7 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 0Against 72Abst. 7No vote 6 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.87
ESNFor 1Against 9Abst. 14No vote 3 of 27Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.38
No groupFor 19Against 3Abst. 4No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria060
Belgium020
Czechia080
Denmark010
Spain060
France0280
Greece010
Hungary0100
Italy007
Latvia010
Netherlands060
Poland020
Portugal010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 664 members

No vote recorded, 55

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 55 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 Jul 2026Amendment 33 to paragraph 49 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment114 for, 539 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.79 612 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 17, adding text after recital M EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment129 for, 529 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 19 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.79 613 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 31, adding text after paragraph 45 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment118 for, 518 against, 23 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.79 605 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
26 Mar 2026Amendment 50, adding text after recital 1 Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of AmericaAmendment65 for, 526 against, 48 abstained Rejected For 10 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.78 598 voters
27 Nov 2025Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 9 Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in SudanAmendment94 for, 475 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 16 %r · shared0.78 555 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 18 to paragraph 5 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment122 for, 534 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.78 615 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 32 to paragraph 48 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment131 for, 520 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 20 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.78 609 voters
9 Jul 2026Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 4 The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, SudanAmendment87 for, 454 against, 62 abstained Rejected For 14 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.78 554 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 26 to paragraph 15 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAmendment123 for, 486 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 20 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.78 585 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 42, adding text after paragraph 121 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Amendment80 for, 529 against, 42 abstained Rejected For 12 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.77 606 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183488
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 7 — part 2 to paragraph 10 — The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies”. Vote, 20 January 2026. votingId 183488, reference 2025/2079(INL). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183488 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 20 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 20 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-20, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-01-20/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-01-20-183488,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 7 — part 2 to paragraph 10 — The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-01-20},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183488}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183488},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 183488, reference 2025/2079(INL). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-20 (CC BY 4.0)}
}