Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 28, after paragraph 2

The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies

Vote
Amendment 28, after paragraph 2
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 20 Jan 2026
Result
190 for · 454 against · 16 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
20 January 2026, 12:53
More facts (6)
Position
vote 5 of 36 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN
Official label
A10-0269/2025 – René Repasi – After § 2 – Am 28
Text
Report A-10-2025-0269
Dossier
2025/2079(INL)
Vote id
183485
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 190 for, 454 against, 16 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 29 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 2Against 33Abst. 3No vote 8 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.80
GreensFor 0Against 51Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 127Abst. 0No vote 9 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 66Abst. 2No vote 7 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
EPPFor 4Against 169Abst. 6No vote 9 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.92
ECRFor 64Against 3Abst. 3No vote 9 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.87
PatriotsFor 79Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 24Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 17Against 5Abst. 2No vote 6 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium020
Cyprus010
Germany040
Denmark001
Spain010
Finland030
France080
Greece040
Ireland200
Italy090
Portugal010
Sweden002

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 660 members

No vote recorded, 59

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 59 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
31 Mar 2025Tuesday's agenda — Request by the PfE Group Final vote Tuesday's agenda – Request by the PfE GroupOther118 for, 326 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 26 %r · shared0.97 411 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 12 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment193 for, 428 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 577 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 1 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAmendment193 for, 431 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 584 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 May 2026Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group — Terrorist attack in Modena Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group – Terrorist attack in ModenaOther134 for, 309 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 30 %r · shared0.96 408 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 3 to recital F The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basinsAmendment198 for, 440 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 595 voters
16 Jun 2026Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 20 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment202 for, 465 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.95 613 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 11 to paragraph 16 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment190 for, 470 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.95 606 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 72, adding text after paragraph 39 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Amendment186 for, 446 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 599 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 17 to paragraph 1, after point o Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAmendment205 for, 437 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.95 597 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 7 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment200 for, 433 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 600 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183485
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 28, after paragraph 2 — The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies”. Vote, 20 January 2026. votingId 183485, reference 2025/2079(INL). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183485 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 20 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 20 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-20, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-01-20/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-01-20-183485,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 28, after paragraph 2 — The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-01-20},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183485}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183485},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 183485, reference 2025/2079(INL). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-20 (CC BY 4.0)}
}