Vote · Roll call

Amendment 3, after paragraph 1

The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies

Vote: Amendment 3, after paragraph 1
Decision: No. 6 of the sitting of 20 Jan 2026
Result: 116 for · 489 against · 56 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date: 20 January 2026, 12:52

More facts (6)

Position: vote 2 of 36 on the decision
Requested by: roll call: The Left
Official label: A10-0269/2025 – René Repasi – After § 1 – Am 3
Text: Report A-10-2025-0269
Dossier: 2025/2079(INL)
Vote id: 183483

Position: vote 2 of 36 on the decision
Requested by: roll call: The Left
Official label: A10-0269/2025 – René Repasi – After § 1 – Am 3
Text: Report A-10-2025-0269
Dossier: 2025/2079(INL)
Vote id: 183483

Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP)

Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Rejected · 18 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. **No vote**: in office that day, no position recorded. **Majority line**: the most common position. **Clear line**: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. **Cohesion**: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
Group	For	Against	Abst.	No vote	Majority line	Clear line	Cohesion
The Left	For 36	Against 2	Abst. 0	No vote 8 of 46	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.92
Greens	For 17	Against 0	Abst. 34	No vote 2 of 53	Majority line Abstained	Clear line Abstained	Cohesion 0.50
S&D	For 38	Against 83	Abst. 2	No vote 13 of 136	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.51
Renew	For 1	Against 67	Abst. 0	No vote 7 of 75	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.98
EPP	For 0	Against 179	Abst. 1	No vote 8 of 188	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.99
ECR	For 0	Against 72	Abst. 0	No vote 7 of 79	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 1.00
Patriots	For 5	Against 74	Abst. 0	No vote 6 of 85	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.91
ESN	For 1	Against 8	Abst. 15	No vote 3 of 27	Majority line Abstained	Clear line Divided	Cohesion 0.44
No group	For 18	Against 4	Abst. 4	No vote 4 of 30	Majority line —	Clear line No line	Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Each cell: members of that country in that group who voted for – against – abstained (group at the date of the vote). Shading: the share of the cell's votes that were for; the stronger the shading, the more for (scale below). — : no member voted.
Country	The Left	Greens	S&D	Renew	EPP	ECR	Patriots	ESN	No group
Austria	no member voted	0–0–2	0–4–1	0–2–0	0–5–0	no member voted	0–6–0	no member voted	no member voted
Belgium	2–0–0	1–0–1	1–3–0	0–3–0	0–3–0	0–2–0	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted
Bulgaria	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–5–0	0–1–0	no member voted	0–0–3	0–2–0
Cyprus	1–0–0	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted	0–2–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Czechia	no member voted	0–0–1	no member voted	no member voted	0–5–0	0–3–0	0–8–0	1–0–0	2–0–0
Germany	4–0–0	0–0–15	1–11–0	0–7–0	0–31–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–5–8	7–1–0
Denmark	no member voted	0–0–3	0–2–0	0–4–0	0–2–0	0–1–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted
Estonia	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Spain	1–0–0	4–0–0	0–18–0	0–1–0	0–21–0	0–2–0	0–6–0	no member voted	no member voted
Finland	3–0–0	0–0–2	0–1–0	0–3–0	0–4–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
France	8–0–0	4–0–0	10–1–0	0–12–0	0–6–0	0–4–0	0–28–0	no member voted	1–0–0
Greece	4–0–0	no member voted	0–3–0	no member voted	0–7–0	0–2–0	0–1–0	no member voted	1–0–3
Croatia	no member voted	1–0–0	4–0–0	no member voted	0–5–1	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Hungary	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	no member voted	0–6–0	no member voted	0–10–0	0–0–1	no member voted
Ireland	2–0–0	no member voted	0–1–0	0–6–0	0–4–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Italy	7–2–0	4–0–0	15–2–1	no member voted	0–9–0	0–23–0	0–7–0	no member voted	no member voted
Lithuania	no member voted	0–0–1	0–1–0	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–2–0	no member voted	0–0–1	no member voted
Luxembourg	no member voted	1–0–0	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	0–0–1
Latvia	no member voted	0–0–1	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted
Malta	no member voted	no member voted	0–3–0	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Netherlands	no member voted	0–0–6	0–4–0	0–7–0	0–6–0	0–1–0	5–1–0	no member voted	no member voted
Poland	no member voted	no member voted	0–3–0	0–1–0	0–21–0	0–18–0	0–2–0	0–3–0	no member voted
Portugal	2–0–0	no member voted	0–8–0	0–1–0	0–6–0	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted
Romania	no member voted	1–0–0	7–4–0	0–3–0	0–10–0	0–4–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–1–0
Sweden	2–0–0	0–0–2	0–4–0	0–3–0	0–5–0	0–3–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovenia	no member voted	1–0–0	0–1–0	1–1–0	0–5–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovakia	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	0–4–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–0–2	6–0–0

Share for: 0–19 %20–39 %40–59 %60–79 %80–100 %

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
Country	For	Abst.
Austria	0	2
Belgium	1	1
Czechia	0	1
Germany	0	15
Denmark	0	3
Spain	4	0
Finland	0	2
France	4	0
Croatia	1	0
Italy	4	0
Lithuania	0	1
Luxembourg	1	0
Latvia	0	1
Netherlands	0	6
Romania	1	0
Sweden	0	2
Slovenia	1	0

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 661 members

No vote recorded, 58

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 58 members

Name · group that day · country

Adrian-George AXINIA group that day: ECR · Romania
Aldo PATRICIELLO group that day: Patriots · Italy
Alma EZCURRA ALMANSA group that day: EPP · Spain
Alvise PÉREZ group that day: No group · Spain
András GYÜRK group that day: Patriots · Hungary
Andrzej BUŁA group that day: EPP · Poland
Anja HAZEKAMP group that day: The Left · Netherlands
Antonio DECARO group that day: S&D · Italy
António TÂNGER CORRÊA group that day: Patriots · Portugal
Assita KANKO group that day: ECR · Belgium
Carlo FIDANZA group that day: ECR · Italy
Catherine GRISET group that day: Patriots · France
Chloé RIDEL group that day: S&D · France
Dario NARDELLA group that day: S&D · Italy
Diana IOVANOVICI ŞOŞOACĂ group that day: No group · Romania
Dominik TARCZYŃSKI group that day: ECR · Poland
Eero HEINÄLUOMA group that day: S&D · Finland
Eva MAYDELL group that day: EPP · Bulgaria
Gerolf ANNEMANS group that day: Patriots · Belgium
Gheorghe PIPEREA group that day: ECR · Romania
Grzegorz BRAUN group that day: No group · Poland
Irene MONTERO group that day: The Left · Spain
Irene TINAGLI group that day: S&D · Italy
Isabel SERRA SÁNCHEZ group that day: The Left · Spain
Janusz LEWANDOWSKI group that day: EPP · Poland
Javi LÓPEZ group that day: S&D · Spain
Joachim STREIT group that day: Renew · Germany
João COTRIM DE FIGUEIREDO group that day: Renew · Portugal
Katarina BARLEY group that day: S&D · Germany
Klara DOSTALOVA group that day: Patriots · Czechia
Laura BALLARÍN CEREZA group that day: S&D · Spain
Ľubica KARVAŠOVÁ group that day: Renew · Slovakia
Luke Ming FLANAGAN group that day: The Left · Ireland
Majdouline SBAI group that day: Greens · France
Małgorzata GOSIEWSKA group that day: ECR · Poland
Martin HOJSÍK group that day: Renew · Slovakia
Mary KHAN group that day: ESN · Germany
Michael VON DER SCHULENBURG group that day: No group · Germany
Mimmo LUCANO group that day: The Left · Italy
Nathalie LOISEAU group that day: Renew · France
Niels FUGLSANG group that day: S&D · Denmark
Nora MEBAREK group that day: S&D · France
Pär HOLMGREN group that day: Greens · Sweden
Paulo DO NASCIMENTO CABRAL group that day: EPP · Portugal
Per CLAUSEN group that day: The Left · Denmark
Pernando BARRENA ARZA group that day: The Left · Spain
Peter AGIUS group that day: EPP · Malta
Péter MAGYAR group that day: EPP · Hungary
Petr BYSTRON group that day: ESN · Germany
Roberta METSOLA group that day: EPP · Malta
Sarah KNAFO group that day: ESN · France
Sofie ERIKSSON group that day: S&D · Sweden
Sophie WILMÈS group that day: Renew · Belgium
Stephen Nikola BARTULICA group that day: ECR · Croatia
Tobias CREMER group that day: S&D · Germany
Vilija BLINKEVIČIŪTĖ group that day: S&D · Lithuania
Younous OMARJEE group that day: The Left · France
Yvan VEROUGSTRAETE group that day: Renew · Belgium

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
8 Jul 2026	Amendment 31, adding text after paragraph 45 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)	Amendment	118 for, 518 against, 23 abstained Rejected	For 18 %	Requested by The Left	r · shared0.78 602 voters
8 Jul 2026	Amendment 37 to paragraph 54 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)	Amendment	123 for, 536 against, 8 abstained Rejected	For 18 %	Requested by The Left	r · shared0.75 610 voters
28 Apr 2026	Amendment 40, adding text after paragraph 121 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034	Amendment	98 for, 508 against, 48 abstained Rejected	For 15 %	Requested by The Left	r · shared0.75 604 voters

Show 7 more

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
28 Apr 2026	Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 37 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034	Amendment	103 for, 470 against, 83 abstained Rejected	For 16 %	Requested by The Left	r · shared0.75 606 voters
8 Jul 2026	Amendment 32 to paragraph 48 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)	Amendment	131 for, 520 against, 12 abstained Rejected	For 20 %	Requested by The Left	r · shared0.75 606 voters
21 May 2025	Request by The Left Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group	Other	102 for, 378 against, 7 abstained Rejected	For 21 %		r · shared0.74 449 voters
11 Mar 2026	Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 11 European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026	Amendment	107 for, 458 against, 65 abstained Rejected	For 17 %	Requested by The Left	r · shared0.74 587 voters
7 Jul 2026	Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 50 Competition policy – annual report 2025	Amendment	108 for, 468 against, 77 abstained Rejected	For 17 %	Requested by The Left	r · shared0.74 601 voters
26 Mar 2026	Amendment 50, adding text after recital 1 Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America	Amendment	65 for, 526 against, 48 abstained Rejected	For 10 %	Requested by The Left	r · shared0.73 594 voters
8 Jul 2026	Amendment 17, adding text after recital M EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)	Amendment	129 for, 529 against, 8 abstained Rejected	For 19 %	Requested by The Left	r · shared0.73 610 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Decision The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Resolution · report by René Repasi 20 Jan 2026 Adopted

Other votes on this decision

Vote The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies — Amendment 33 to paragraph 2 Roll-call vote · 20 Jan 2026 20 Jan 2026
Vote The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies — Amendment 28, adding text after paragraph 2 Roll-call vote · 20 Jan 2026 20 Jan 2026
Vote The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies — Amendment 7 to paragraph 10 — part 2 Roll-call vote · 20 Jan 2026 20 Jan 2026
Vote The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies — Amendment 29, adding text after paragraph 10 Roll-call vote · 20 Jan 2026 20 Jan 2026
Vote The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies — Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 14 Roll-call vote · 20 Jan 2026 20 Jan 2026
Vote The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies — Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 14 Roll-call vote · 20 Jan 2026 20 Jan 2026
Vote The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies — Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 29 Roll-call vote · 20 Jan 2026 20 Jan 2026
Vote The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies — Amendments 25 + 34 (voted as one) to paragraph 37 Roll-call vote · 20 Jan 2026 20 Jan 2026
Vote The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies — Amendment 26 to paragraph 40 Roll-call vote · 20 Jan 2026 20 Jan 2026
Vote The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies — Amendment 35 to paragraph 40 Roll-call vote · 20 Jan 2026 20 Jan 2026

See all

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183483
Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 20 January 2026 (European Parliament)
Results of votes, sitting of 20 January 2026 (European Parliament)
Data source: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-20
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 3, after paragraph 1 — The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies”. Vote, 20 January 2026. votingId 183483, reference 2025/2079(INL). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183483 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 20 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 20 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-20, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-01-20/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).

BibTeX

@misc{epw-vote-2026-01-20-183483,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 3, after paragraph 1 — The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-01-20},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183483}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183483},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 183483, reference 2025/2079(INL). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-20 (CC BY 4.0)}
}