Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Final vote on the whole text

The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies

Vote
Final vote on the whole text
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 20 Jan 2026
Result
492 for · 144 against · 28 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
20 January 2026, 12:57
More facts (6)
Effect
Adopted — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 36 of 36 on the decision
Official label
A10-0269/2025 – René Repasi – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Text
Report A-10-2025-0269
Dossier
2025/2079(INL)
Vote id
183160
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 492 for, 144 against, 28 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 74 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Adopted.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 35Abst. 4No vote 7 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.85
GreensFor 47Against 0Abst. 4No vote 2 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
S&DFor 127Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 65Against 0Abst. 1No vote 9 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 181Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 54Against 14Abst. 4No vote 7 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.63
PatriotsFor 9Against 63Abst. 7No vote 6 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.70
ESNFor 0Against 23Abst. 0No vote 4 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 9Against 9Abst. 8No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria020
Czechia010
Germany0130
Hungary010
Lithuania010
Poland030
Slovakia020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 664 members

No vote recorded, 55

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 55 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Mar 2025Final vote — text as a whole European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025Final469 for, 162 against, 54 abstained Adopted For 68 %r · shared0.90 629 voters
7 May 2025Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European External Action ServiceFinal475 for, 136 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 72 %r · shared0.90 615 voters
7 May 2025Separate vote on paragraph 88 The European Water Resilience StrategySeparate vote460 for, 165 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.89 597 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Dec 2024Final vote — text as a whole Amendment of Annex VI – Powers and responsibilities of the standing committeesFinal448 for, 161 against, 40 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.88 598 voters
28 Apr 2026Paragraph 5 — part 1 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Split vote481 for, 132 against, 38 abstained Adopted For 74 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.88 605 voters
22 Jan 2026Separate vote on paragraph 98 European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructureSeparate vote459 for, 140 against, 34 abstained Adopted For 73 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.88 617 voters
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 46 — part 2 Public procurementSplit vote475 for, 152 against, 23 abstained Adopted For 73 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.87 609 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 45 to Article 2 — part 1 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment496 for, 138 against, 13 abstained Adopted For 77 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 604 voters
20 Jan 2026Final vote on the motion for a resolution Safeguarding and promoting financial stability amid economic uncertaintiesFinal491 for, 83 against, 84 abstained Adopted For 75 %r · shared0.87 653 voters
10 Mar 2026Final vote on the motion for a resolution European Union regulatory fitness and subsidiarity and proportionality – report on Better Law-Making covering 2023 and 2024Final493 for, 92 against, 44 abstained Adopted For 78 %r · shared0.87 589 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183160
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Final vote on the whole text — The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies”. Vote, 20 January 2026. votingId 183160, reference 2025/2079(INL). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183160 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 20 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 20 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-20, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-01-20/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-01-20-183160,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Final vote on the whole text — The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-01-20},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183160}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-20/183160},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 183160, reference 2025/2079(INL). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-20-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-20 (CC BY 4.0)}
}