Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 25 — part 2

Digitalisation, artificial intelligence and algorithmic management in the workplace – shaping the future of work

Vote
Paragraph 25 — part 2
Result
486 for · 159 against · 12 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
17 December 2025, 12:32
More facts (6)
Position
vote 10 of 21 on the decision
Requested by
split vote: Patriots
Official label
A10-0244/2025 – Andrzej Buła – § 25/2
Vote id
182783
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 486 for, 159 against, 12 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 74 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “those words”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 40Against 0Abst. 1No vote 5 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 48Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 126Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 55Against 9Abst. 4No vote 7 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.71
EPPFor 163Against 10Abst. 0No vote 15 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.91
ECRFor 3Against 72Abst. 0No vote 4 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
PatriotsFor 28Against 42Abst. 7No vote 8 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.32
ESNFor 2Against 22Abst. 0No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
No groupFor 21Against 4Abst. 0No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria100
Czechia100
Germany900
Spain010
France100
Greece130
Luxembourg100
Poland100
Slovakia600

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 657 members

No vote recorded, 62

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 62 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Final vote — text as a whole Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategyFinal385 for, 141 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 66 %r · shared0.87 543 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point ab — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote404 for, 139 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 73 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.85 518 voters
9 Sept 2025Recital E — part 3 of 3 Public procurementSplit vote481 for, 157 against, 4 abstained Adopted For 75 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.85 589 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point n — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote415 for, 97 against, 54 abstained Adopted For 73 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.84 531 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point u — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote423 for, 108 against, 27 abstained Adopted For 76 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.84 525 voters
12 Feb 2026Recital M — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote406 for, 122 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 74 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.83 512 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point v — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote417 for, 138 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 74 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.83 530 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 4 — part 1 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategySplit vote410 for, 119 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.83 546 voters
20 Jan 2026Final vote — text as a whole Humanitarian aid in a time of polycrisis – reaffirming our principles for a more effective and ambitious response to humanitarian crisesFinal444 for, 153 against, 55 abstained Adopted For 68 %r · shared0.82 612 voters
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 55 — part 2 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote432 for, 137 against, 41 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.82 566 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 9 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 25 — part 2 — Digitalisation, artificial intelligence and algorithmic management in the workplace – shaping the future of work”. Vote, 17 December 2025. votingId 182783, reference 2025/2080(INL). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-17/182783 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 December 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 December 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-12-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-12-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-12-17-182783,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 25 — part 2 — Digitalisation, artificial intelligence and algorithmic management in the workplace – shaping the future of work}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-12-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-17/182783}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-17/182783},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 182783, reference 2025/2080(INL). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-12-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}