Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 16, after paragraph 32

Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material

Vote
Amendment 16, after paragraph 32
Decision
No. 11 of the sitting of 26 Nov 2025
Result
233 for · 383 against · 36 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
26 November 2025, 12:46
More facts (6)
Position
vote 27 of 37 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR
Official label
B10-0500/2025 – After § 32 – Am 16
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0500
Dossier
2025/2971(RSP)
Vote id
182038
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 233 for, 383 against, 36 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 36 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 12Against 20Abst. 4No vote 10 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.33
GreensFor 0Against 52Abst. 0No vote 1 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 5Against 120Abst. 0No vote 11 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
RenewFor 4Against 63Abst. 0No vote 8 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.91
EPPFor 22Against 126Abst. 21No vote 19 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.62
ECRFor 73Against 1Abst. 0No vote 5 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 81Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 21Against 0Abst. 1No vote 5 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
No groupFor 15Against 1Abst. 10No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria600
Belgium300
Czechia900
Denmark100
Spain600
France2900
Greece100
Hungary1000
Italy600
Latvia100
Netherlands600
Poland100
Portugal200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 652 members

No vote recorded, 67

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 67 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 May 2026Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group — Terrorist attack in Modena Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group – Terrorist attack in ModenaOther134 for, 309 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 30 %r · shared0.88 409 voters
11 Sept 2025Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 13 Implementation and streamlining of EU internal market rules to strengthen the single marketAmendment208 for, 401 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.87 564 voters
11 Sept 2025Amendment 6 to paragraph 27 Implementation and streamlining of EU internal market rules to strengthen the single marketAmendment197 for, 402 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.87 563 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Jun 2026Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 49 2025 Commission report on AlbaniaAmendment195 for, 429 against, 21 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.87 587 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 65 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment194 for, 417 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.86 569 voters
30 Apr 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 10 Enforcement of the Digital Markets ActAmendment186 for, 383 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.86 526 voters
11 Sept 2025Amendment 7 to paragraph 36 Implementation and streamlining of EU internal market rules to strengthen the single marketAmendment201 for, 399 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.86 558 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 62, adding text after paragraph 12 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Amendment199 for, 413 against, 25 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.86 579 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 1, adding text after recital C The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basinsAmendment198 for, 445 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.86 596 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 86 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment200 for, 411 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.86 566 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-26/182038
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 16, after paragraph 32 — Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material”. Vote, 26 November 2025. votingId 182038, reference 2025/2971(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-26/182038 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 26 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-26-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 26 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-26-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-26, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-11-26/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-11-26-182038,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 16, after paragraph 32 — Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-11-26},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-26/182038}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-26/182038},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 182038, reference 2025/2971(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-26-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-26-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-26 (CC BY 4.0)}
}