Amendment 12, after paragraph 31 · Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material · Vote

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Rejected · 27 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. **No vote**: in office that day, no position recorded. **Majority line**: the most common position. **Clear line**: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. **Cohesion**: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
Group	For	Against	Abst.	No vote	Majority line	Clear line	Cohesion
The Left	For 39	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 7 of 46	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
Greens	For 4	Against 40	Abst. 5	No vote 4 of 53	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.72
S&D	For 11	Against 102	Abst. 0	No vote 23 of 136	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.85
Renew	For 1	Against 66	Abst. 0	No vote 8 of 75	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.98
EPP	For 4	Against 169	Abst. 0	No vote 15 of 188	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.97
ECR	For 8	Against 15	Abst. 47	No vote 9 of 79	Majority line Abstained	Clear line Abstained	Cohesion 0.51
Patriots	For 71	Against 0	Abst. 10	No vote 4 of 85	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.81
ESN	For 18	Against 4	Abst. 0	No vote 5 of 27	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.73
No group	For 14	Against 3	Abst. 9	No vote 4 of 30	Majority line —	Clear line No line	Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Each cell: members of that country in that group who voted for – against – abstained (group at the date of the vote). Shading: the share of the cell's votes that were for; the stronger the shading, the more for (scale below). — : no member voted.
Country	The Left	Greens	S&D	Renew	EPP	ECR	Patriots	ESN	No group
Austria	no member voted	0–2–0	5–0–0	0–1–0	0–5–0	no member voted	6–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Belgium	2–0–0	0–1–0	2–2–0	0–5–0	0–3–0	0–0–2	3–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Bulgaria	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	1–2–0	0–4–0	0–0–1	no member voted	2–0–0	0–2–0
Cyprus	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	0–0–1
Czechia	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–5–0	0–0–3	9–0–0	0–1–0	2–0–0
Germany	4–0–0	1–13–1	0–13–0	0–8–0	0–28–0	no member voted	no member voted	12–1–0	6–1–1
Denmark	1–0–0	0–3–0	0–2–0	0–4–0	0–2–0	0–0–1	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Estonia	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Spain	2–0–0	0–4–0	0–18–0	0–1–0	0–20–0	0–0–2	6–0–0	no member voted	0–0–1
Finland	3–0–0	0–2–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	0–4–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
France	7–0–0	0–0–3	no member voted	0–11–0	0–6–0	4–0–0	29–0–0	no member voted	0–0–1
Greece	4–0–0	no member voted	0–3–0	no member voted	0–6–0	0–0–2	1–0–0	no member voted	2–0–1
Croatia	no member voted	0–1–0	0–4–0	no member voted	4–2–0	0–0–1	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Hungary	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	no member voted	0–5–0	no member voted	0–0–10	1–0–0	no member voted
Ireland	3–0–0	no member voted	0–1–0	0–6–0	0–4–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Italy	9–0–0	0–2–1	0–20–0	no member voted	0–8–0	1–0–20	6–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Lithuania	no member voted	0–1–0	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–0–1	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted
Luxembourg	no member voted	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	0–0–1
Latvia	no member voted	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	0–0–3	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Malta	no member voted	no member voted	3–0–0	no member voted	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Netherlands	no member voted	0–6–0	0–4–0	0–5–0	0–5–0	0–0–1	6–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Poland	no member voted	no member voted	0–3–0	0–1–0	0–21–0	0–15–3	1–0–0	0–2–0	0–0–1
Portugal	1–0–0	no member voted	0–6–0	0–1–0	0–7–0	no member voted	2–0–0	no member voted	no member voted
Romania	no member voted	0–1–0	0–10–0	0–3–0	0–10–0	2–0–4	no member voted	no member voted	0–0–2
Sweden	2–0–0	3–0–0	0–5–0	0–3–0	0–5–0	0–0–3	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovenia	no member voted	0–1–0	1–0–0	0–2–0	0–5–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovakia	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	0–5–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	4–0–0

Share for: 0–19 %20–39 %40–59 %60–79 %80–100 %

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
Country	For	Abst.
Austria	6	0
Belgium	3	0
Czechia	9	0
Denmark	1	0
Spain	6	0
France	29	0
Greece	1	0
Hungary	0	10
Italy	6	0
Latvia	1	0
Netherlands	6	0
Poland	1	0
Portugal	2	0

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 640 members

No vote recorded, 79

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 79 members

Name · group that day · country

Adam JARUBAS group that day: EPP · Poland
Alberico GAMBINO group that day: ECR · Italy
Aldo PATRICIELLO group that day: Patriots · Italy
Alessandro CIRIANI group that day: ECR · Italy
Alma EZCURRA ALMANSA group that day: EPP · Spain
Ana Catarina MENDES group that day: S&D · Portugal
Anja ARNDT group that day: ESN · Germany
Anja HAZEKAMP group that day: The Left · Netherlands
Anouk VAN BRUG group that day: Renew · Netherlands
Antonio DECARO group that day: S&D · Italy
Aurelijus VERYGA group that day: ECR · Lithuania
Aurore LALUCQ group that day: S&D · France
Axel VOSS group that day: EPP · Germany
Branislav ONDRUŠ group that day: No group · Slovakia
Brigitte VAN DEN BERG group that day: Renew · Netherlands
Catarina MARTINS group that day: The Left · Portugal
César LUENA group that day: S&D · Spain
Chloé RIDEL group that day: S&D · France
Christophe CLERGEAU group that day: S&D · France
Claire FITA group that day: S&D · France
Claudiu MANDA group that day: S&D · Romania
Costas MAVRIDES group that day: S&D · Cyprus
Daniel CASPARY group that day: EPP · Germany
David CORMAND group that day: Greens · France
Eero HEINÄLUOMA group that day: S&D · Finland
Emma RAFOWICZ group that day: S&D · France
Emmanouil KEFALOGIANNIS group that day: EPP · Greece
Eric SARGIACOMO group that day: S&D · France
Erik KALIŇÁK group that day: No group · Slovakia
Eva MAYDELL group that day: EPP · Bulgaria
Fabio DE MASI group that day: No group · Germany
Francesco VENTOLA group that day: ECR · Italy
Francisco ASSIS group that day: S&D · Portugal
François KALFON group that day: S&D · France
Fulvio MARTUSCIELLO group that day: EPP · Italy
Gabriella GERZSENYI group that day: EPP · Hungary
Geadis GEADI group that day: ECR · Cyprus
György HÖLVÉNYI group that day: Patriots · Hungary
Helmut BRANDSTÄTTER group that day: Renew · Austria
Ilia LAZAROV group that day: EPP · Bulgaria
Isabel SERRA SÁNCHEZ group that day: The Left · Spain
Jaak MADISON group that day: ECR · Estonia
Jean-Marc GERMAIN group that day: S&D · France
Jérémy DECERLE group that day: Renew · France
João COTRIM DE FIGUEIREDO group that day: Renew · Portugal
Johan VAN OVERTVELDT group that day: ECR · Belgium
Katri KULMUNI group that day: Renew · Finland
Kostas PAPADAKIS group that day: No group · Greece
Leoluca ORLANDO group that day: Greens · Italy
Majdouline SBAI group that day: Greens · France
Manuela RIPA group that day: EPP · Germany
Michał SZCZERBA group that day: EPP · Poland
Michal WIEZIK group that day: Renew · Slovakia
Mimmo LUCANO group that day: The Left · Italy
Murielle LAURENT group that day: S&D · France
Niels FUGLSANG group that day: S&D · Denmark
Nora MEBAREK group that day: S&D · France
Pablo ARIAS ECHEVERRÍA group that day: EPP · Spain
Pernando BARRENA ARZA group that day: The Left · Spain
Péter MAGYAR group that day: EPP · Hungary
Pierre JOUVET group that day: S&D · France
Rada LAYKOVA group that day: ESN · Bulgaria
Raphaël GLUCKSMANN group that day: S&D · France
René REPASI group that day: S&D · Germany
Rima HASSAN group that day: The Left · France
Roberta METSOLA group that day: EPP · Malta
Sander SMIT group that day: EPP · Netherlands
Sandra GÓMEZ LÓPEZ group that day: S&D · Spain
Sandro GOZI group that day: Renew · France
Sarah KNAFO group that day: ESN · France
Saskia BRICMONT group that day: Greens · Belgium
Silvia SARDONE group that day: Patriots · Italy
Stanisław TYSZKA group that day: ESN · Poland
Thomas PELLERIN-CARLIN group that day: S&D · France
Tobiasz BOCHEŃSKI group that day: ECR · Poland
Tomasz BUCZEK group that day: Patriots · Poland
Tomasz FROELICH group that day: ESN · Germany
Waldemar BUDA group that day: ECR · Poland
Younous OMARJEE group that day: The Left · France

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
13 Feb 2025	Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 1 Further deterioration of the political situation in Georgia	Amendment	142 for, 405 against, 6 abstained Rejected	For 26 %	Requested by The Left	r · shared0.81 493 voters
18 Dec 2024	Amendment 4 to paragraph 4, point 2, paragraph 4 Amendment of Annex VI – Powers and responsibilities of the standing committees	Amendment	173 for, 459 against, 14 abstained Rejected	For 27 %	Requested by The Left	r · shared0.80 576 voters
13 Nov 2025	Amendments 179 + 385 (voted as one) to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements	Amendment	222 for, 415 against, 6 abstained Rejected	For 35 %	Requested by Greens, The Left, Patriots	r · shared0.79 585 voters

Show 7 more

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
20 Jan 2026	Amendment 27 to paragraph 41 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies	Amendment	162 for, 484 against, 18 abstained Rejected	For 24 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.79 601 voters
13 Nov 2025	Amendments 188 + 388 (voted as one) to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements	Amendment	229 for, 407 against, 5 abstained Rejected	For 36 %	Requested by Greens, The Left	r · shared0.78 583 voters
2 Apr 2025	Amendment 49 to paragraph 44 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024	Amendment	205 for, 403 against, 71 abstained Rejected	For 30 %	Requested by The Left	r · shared0.78 604 voters
13 Nov 2025	Amendments 186 + 387 (voted as one) to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements	Amendment	223 for, 416 against, 4 abstained Rejected	For 35 %	Requested by Greens, The Left, Patriots	r · shared0.78 586 voters
17 Jun 2026	Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 1 2025 Commission report on Georgia	Amendment	159 for, 396 against, 90 abstained Rejected	For 25 %	Requested by The Left	r · shared0.78 574 voters
20 Jan 2026	Amendment 26 to paragraph 40 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies	Amendment	136 for, 487 against, 24 abstained Rejected	For 21 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.77 588 voters
10 Jul 2025	Final vote on the motion for a resolution Motion of censure on the Commission	Final	175 for, 360 against, 18 abstained Rejected	For 32 %		r · shared0.77 502 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Decision Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material Resolution · motion for a resolution 26 Nov 2025 Adopted

Other votes on this decision

Vote Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material — Final vote on the motion for a resolution Roll-call vote · 26 Nov 2025 26 Nov 2025
Vote Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material — Amendment 3 to paragraph 1 Roll-call vote · 26 Nov 2025 26 Nov 2025
Vote Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material — Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 1 Roll-call vote · 26 Nov 2025 26 Nov 2025
Vote Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material — Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 1 Roll-call vote · 26 Nov 2025 26 Nov 2025
Vote Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material — Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 1 Roll-call vote · 26 Nov 2025 26 Nov 2025
Vote Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material — Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 6 Roll-call vote · 26 Nov 2025 26 Nov 2025
Vote Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material — Amendment 18 to paragraph 11 Roll-call vote · 26 Nov 2025 26 Nov 2025
Vote Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material — Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 11 Roll-call vote · 26 Nov 2025 26 Nov 2025
Vote Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material — Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 11 Roll-call vote · 26 Nov 2025 26 Nov 2025
Vote Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material — Amendment 10 to paragraph 13 Roll-call vote · 26 Nov 2025 26 Nov 2025

See all

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-26/182035
Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 26 November 2025 (European Parliament)
Results of votes, sitting of 26 November 2025 (European Parliament)
Data source: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-26
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 12, after paragraph 31 — Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material”. Vote, 26 November 2025. votingId 182035, reference 2025/2971(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-26/182035 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 26 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-26-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 26 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-26-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-26, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-11-26/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).

BibTeX

@misc{epw-vote-2025-11-26-182035,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 12, after paragraph 31 — Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-11-26},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-26/182035}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-26/182035},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 182035, reference 2025/2971(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-26-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-26-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-26 (CC BY 4.0)}
}