Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Separate vote: recital BI

Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded

Vote
Separate vote: recital BI
Result
418 for · 160 against · 51 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
25 November 2025, 12:40
More facts (6)
Position
vote 38 of 43 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN, S&D
Official label
A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – Recital BI
Dossier
2018/0902R
Vote id
181700
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 418 for, 160 against, 51 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 66 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 36Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 48Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 114Against 0Abst. 0No vote 22 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 66Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 150Against 6Abst. 10No vote 22 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.86
ECRFor 0Against 47Abst. 25No vote 7 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.48
PatriotsFor 0Against 72Abst. 6No vote 7 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
ESNFor 0Against 23Abst. 0No vote 4 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 4Against 12Abst. 10No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Cyprus100
Germany400
Denmark100
Spain200
Finland300
France700
Greece400
Ireland300
Italy800
Sweden100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 629 members

No vote recorded, 90

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 90 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
23 Oct 2025Separate vote on paragraph 3 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Separate vote383 for, 170 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.94 522 voters
22 Jan 2026Recital P — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote419 for, 158 against, 25 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.93 547 voters
18 Dec 2025Final vote — text as a whole Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regimeFinal386 for, 184 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 66 %r · shared0.93 536 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Final416 for, 190 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 67 %r · shared0.93 550 voters
19 Dec 2024Paragraph 1, point u — part 4 Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote382 for, 159 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by S&D, Renew, Greensr · shared0.93 501 voters
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 101 — part 4 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldSplit vote459 for, 195 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 581 voters
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 101 — part 2 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldSplit vote460 for, 194 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 582 voters
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 101 — part 3 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldSplit vote463 for, 194 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 583 voters
19 Dec 2024Paragraph 1, point r — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote389 for, 153 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.92 505 voters
23 Jan 2025Paragraph 10 — part 1 Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against UkraineSplit vote415 for, 164 against, 32 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 542 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Separate vote: recital BI — Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded”. Vote, 25 November 2025. votingId 181700, reference 2018/0902R. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-25/181700 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 25 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 25 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-25, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-11-25/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-11-25-181700,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Separate vote: recital BI — Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-11-25},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-25/181700}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-25/181700},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 181700, reference 2018/0902R. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-25 (CC BY 4.0)}
}