Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Recital BH — part 1

Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded

Vote
Recital BH — part 1
Result
420 for · 188 against · 24 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
25 November 2025, 12:39
More facts (6)
Position
vote 36 of 43 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN, S&D · split vote: ESN
Official label
A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – Recital BH/1
Dossier
2018/0902R
Vote id
181698
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 420 for, 188 against, 24 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 66 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘upon the production of evidence of gender reassignment surgery’”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 37Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 49Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 112Against 0Abst. 0No vote 24 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 65Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 146Against 16Abst. 5No vote 21 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.81
ECRFor 3Against 69Abst. 0No vote 7 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
PatriotsFor 2Against 73Abst. 4No vote 6 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.89
ESNFor 0Against 19Abst. 4No vote 4 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.74
No groupFor 6Against 11Abst. 11No vote 2 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria002
Czechia010
Germany0140
France010
Hungary010
Poland002
Slovakia020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 632 members

No vote recorded, 87

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 87 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 54 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Separate vote414 for, 195 against, 28 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 572 voters
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 96 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Separate vote413 for, 197 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.92 562 voters
23 Jan 2025Paragraph 10 — part 1 Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against UkraineSplit vote415 for, 164 against, 32 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 544 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
19 Dec 2024Paragraph 1, point u — part 4 Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote382 for, 159 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by S&D, Renew, Greensr · shared0.92 503 voters
23 Oct 2025Separate vote on paragraph 3 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Separate vote383 for, 170 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.92 525 voters
9 Jul 2025Separate vote on paragraph 47 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political ForumSeparate vote449 for, 191 against, 28 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.92 606 voters
22 Jan 2026Recital P — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote419 for, 158 against, 25 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.92 548 voters
9 Jul 2025Paragraph 42 — part 2 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political ForumSplit vote452 for, 172 against, 42 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.92 603 voters
23 Jan 2025Paragraph 10 — part 6 Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against UkraineSplit vote415 for, 167 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 539 voters
13 Nov 2025Paragraph 87 — part 1 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Split vote411 for, 187 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.92 562 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Recital BH — part 1 — Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded”. Vote, 25 November 2025. votingId 181698, reference 2018/0902R. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-25/181698 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 25 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 25 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-25, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-11-25/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-11-25-181698,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Recital BH — part 1 — Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-11-25},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-25/181698}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-25/181698},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 181698, reference 2018/0902R. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-25 (CC BY 4.0)}
}