Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 7, after recital J

Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded

Vote
Amendment 7, after recital J
Result
144 for · 481 against · 17 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
25 November 2025, 12:37
More facts (6)
Position
vote 26 of 43 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN
Official label
A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – After recital J – Am 7
Dossier
2018/0902R
Vote id
181685
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 144 for, 481 against, 17 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 22 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 36Abst. 0No vote 10 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 49Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 122Abst. 0No vote 14 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 65Abst. 0No vote 10 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 1Against 166Abst. 1No vote 20 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
ECRFor 67Against 5Abst. 1No vote 6 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
PatriotsFor 35Against 31Abst. 13No vote 6 of 85Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.16
ESNFor 22Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 19Against 7Abst. 2No vote 2 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria050
Belgium030
Bulgaria041
Cyprus020
Czechia050
Germany0290
Denmark020
Estonia020
Spain0190
Finland040
France060
Greece060
Croatia060
Ireland030
Italy080
Lithuania030
Luxembourg020
Latvia020
Malta010
Netherlands140
Poland0220
Portugal070
Romania0100
Sweden050
Slovenia050
Slovakia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 642 members

No vote recorded, 77

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 77 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 Oct 2025Amendment 164, adding text after paragraph 63 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment176 for, 442 against, 35 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.88 597 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 1 Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2024Amendment183 for, 466 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.87 599 voters
9 Jul 2026Amendment 15 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directiveAmendment161 for, 430 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 27 %r · shared0.87 536 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Mar 2026Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 10 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment173 for, 426 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.87 545 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 47 EU-Uzbekistan Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (resolution)Amendment185 for, 446 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.87 587 voters
9 Jul 2026Amendment 10 to Article 2, after point 4 Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directiveAmendment161 for, 433 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 27 %r · shared0.87 541 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 126 to Article 1 Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measuresAmendment173 for, 477 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.87 599 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 6, adding text after recital D Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment187 for, 419 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.87 562 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 11 to paragraph 26 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment170 for, 426 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.87 542 voters
10 Mar 2025Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ESN Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ESN GroupOther109 for, 317 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 25 %r · shared0.87 393 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 7, after recital J — Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded”. Vote, 25 November 2025. votingId 181685, reference 2018/0902R. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-25/181685 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 25 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 25 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-25, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-11-25/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-11-25-181685,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 7, after recital J — Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-11-25},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-25/181685}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-25/181685},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 181685, reference 2018/0902R. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-25 (CC BY 4.0)}
}