Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Separate vote: paragraph 2

Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded

Vote
Separate vote: paragraph 2
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 25 Nov 2025
Result
408 for · 213 against · 23 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
25 November 2025, 12:32
More facts (6)
Position
vote 4 of 43 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN
Official label
A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – § 2
Text
Report A-10-2025-0231
Dossier
2018/0902R
Vote id
181663
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 408 for, 213 against, 23 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 63 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 35Against 2Abst. 0No vote 9 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.92
GreensFor 48Against 2Abst. 0No vote 3 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
S&DFor 104Against 17Abst. 0No vote 15 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.79
RenewFor 63Against 3Abst. 0No vote 9 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
EPPFor 144Against 12Abst. 12No vote 20 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.79
ECRFor 7Against 61Abst. 5No vote 6 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.75
PatriotsFor 3Against 76Abst. 0No vote 6 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
ESNFor 1Against 22Abst. 0No vote 4 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
No groupFor 3Against 18Abst. 6No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria001
Czechia020
Germany180
Spain010
France001
Greece013
Luxembourg010
Poland001
Romania020
Slovakia230

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 644 members

No vote recorded, 75

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 75 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 Jul 2025Wednesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left GroupOther308 for, 101 against, 0 abstained Adopted For 75 %r · shared0.83 378 voters
22 Jan 2026Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 3 European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructureAmendment426 for, 180 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriots, Renewr · shared0.83 578 voters
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 101 — part 3 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldSplit vote463 for, 194 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.82 595 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 May 2025Amendment 117 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment386 for, 174 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.82 513 voters
17 Sept 2026Final vote — text as a whole Strengthening global health resilience in partner countriesFinal319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.82 426 voters
18 Dec 2025Final vote — text as a whole Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regimeFinal386 for, 184 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 66 %r · shared0.82 545 voters
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 101 — part 2 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldSplit vote460 for, 194 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.81 594 voters
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 101 — part 4 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldSplit vote459 for, 195 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.81 593 voters
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Final416 for, 190 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 67 %r · shared0.81 563 voters
22 Jan 2026Recital P — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote419 for, 158 against, 25 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.81 554 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-25/181663
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Separate vote: paragraph 2 — Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded”. Vote, 25 November 2025. votingId 181663, reference 2018/0902R. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-25/181663 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 25 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 25 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-25, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-11-25/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-11-25-181663,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Separate vote: paragraph 2 — Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-11-25},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-25/181663}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-25/181663},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 181663, reference 2018/0902R. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-25 (CC BY 4.0)}
}