Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 9 — part 2

Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)

Vote
Paragraph 9 — part 2
Decision
No. 11 of the sitting of 25 Nov 2025
Result
315 for · 291 against · 45 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
25 November 2025, 12:46
More facts (6)
Position
vote 7 of 20 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · split vote: Members
Official label
A10-0196/2025 – Brando Benifei – § 9/2
Text
Report A-10-2025-0196
Dossier
2025/2013(INI)
Vote id
181643
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 315 for, 291 against, 45 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 48 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “those words”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 15Against 11Abst. 10No vote 10 of 46Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.13
GreensFor 50Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 114Against 4Abst. 4No vote 14 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.90
RenewFor 57Against 6Abst. 3No vote 9 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.80
EPPFor 76Against 73Abst. 24No vote 15 of 188Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.16
ECRFor 0Against 73Abst. 0No vote 6 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 0Against 79Abst. 0No vote 6 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 23Abst. 0No vote 4 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 3Against 22Abst. 4No vote 1 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria110
Cyprus001
Czechia020
Germany261
Spain010
France001
Greece040
Luxembourg010
Poland001
Romania020
Slovakia050

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 651 members

No vote recorded, 68

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 68 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 Oct 2025Final vote — text as a whole Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiationsFinal310 for, 277 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 48 %r · shared0.83 593 voters
22 Oct 2025Paragraph 4 — part 4 Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiationsSplit vote326 for, 272 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 52 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.82 581 voters
2 Apr 2025Paragraph 14 — part 3 Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2024Split vote357 for, 271 against, 27 abstained Adopted For 55 %r · shared0.81 595 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 Oct 2025Separate vote on paragraph 12 Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiationsSeparate vote334 for, 286 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 52 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.81 594 voters
21 Jan 2026Paragraph 66 — part 2 Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2025Split vote367 for, 256 against, 25 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by ECR, Patriotsr · shared0.80 597 voters
11 Mar 2026Separate vote on paragraph 33 EU enlargement strategySeparate vote268 for, 328 against, 33 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by Members, Renewr · shared0.80 572 voters
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Final328 for, 199 against, 98 abstained Adopted For 52 %r · shared0.78 569 voters
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 30 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European Council and CouncilSeparate vote329 for, 286 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 51 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.77 587 voters
22 Oct 2025Paragraph 4 — part 3 Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiationsSplit vote321 for, 270 against, 47 abstained Adopted For 50 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.77 593 voters
2 Apr 2025Paragraph 45 — part 5 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024Split vote362 for, 283 against, 30 abstained Adopted For 54 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.77 613 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-25/181643
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 9 — part 2 — Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)”. Vote, 25 November 2025. votingId 181643, reference 2025/2013(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-25/181643 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 25 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 25 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-25, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-11-25/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-11-25-181643,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 9 — part 2 — Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-11-25},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-25/181643}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-25/181643},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 181643, reference 2025/2013(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-25 (CC BY 4.0)}
}