Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Final vote on the motion for a resolution

Impact of artificial intelligence on the financial sector

Vote
Final vote on the motion for a resolution
Decision
No. 12 of the sitting of 25 Nov 2025
Result
426 for · 182 against · 39 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
25 November 2025, 12:51
More facts (6)
Effect
Adopted — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 1 of 1 on the decision
Official label
A10-0225/2025 – Arba Kokalari – Motion for a resolution
Text
Report A-10-2025-0225
Dossier
2025/2056(INI)
Vote id
181551
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 426 for, 182 against, 39 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 66 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Adopted.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 26Abst. 11No vote 9 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.55
GreensFor 0Against 41Abst. 8No vote 4 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.76
S&DFor 116Against 3Abst. 1No vote 16 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
RenewFor 66Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 173Against 0Abst. 1No vote 14 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 63Against 2Abst. 7No vote 7 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.81
PatriotsFor 0Against 73Abst. 6No vote 6 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.89
ESNFor 2Against 20Abst. 0No vote 5 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
No groupFor 6Against 17Abst. 5No vote 2 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria020
Czechia010
Germany0130
France100
Hungary100
Poland020
Slovakia020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 647 members

No vote recorded, 72

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 72 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Final vote Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesFinal431 for, 145 against, 76 abstained Adopted For 66 %r · shared0.88 597 voters
11 Feb 2025Final vote — text as a whole European Central Bank – annual report 2024Final378 for, 233 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 59 %r · shared0.88 575 voters
28 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole The role of ocean diplomacy for the competitiveness of EU fisheries and aquacultureFinal430 for, 107 against, 115 abstained Adopted For 66 %r · shared0.85 591 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Amendment 130 to Article 6, paragraph 1, alinéa 1 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment444 for, 189 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.85 593 voters
27 Nov 2025Final vote Amending Regulations on the Internal Market Information System (IMI) and on the single digital gateway as regards certain harmonisation requirements on transparencyFinal400 for, 77 against, 132 abstained Adopted For 66 %r · shared0.83 580 voters
28 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 9 The role of ocean diplomacy for the competitiveness of EU fisheries and aquacultureSeparate vote481 for, 151 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 74 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.82 589 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 134 to Article 6 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment473 for, 154 against, 22 abstained Adopted For 73 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.81 595 voters
16 Jun 2026Separate vote on recital U Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countriesSeparate vote419 for, 226 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by Members (a)r · shared0.81 599 voters
27 Nov 2025Final vote Harmonised requirements in the internal market on transparency of third countries interest representationFinal392 for, 88 against, 133 abstained Adopted For 64 %r · shared0.80 583 voters
19 Sept 2024Amendment 2 to paragraph 14 Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member StatesAmendment410 for, 181 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.80 561 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 1 connection: The decision

The decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-25/181551
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Final vote on the motion for a resolution — Impact of artificial intelligence on the financial sector”. Vote, 25 November 2025. votingId 181551, reference 2025/2056(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-25/181551 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 25 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 25 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-25, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-11-25/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-11-25-181551,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Final vote on the motion for a resolution — Impact of artificial intelligence on the financial sector}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-11-25},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-25/181551}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-25/181551},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 181551, reference 2025/2056(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-25 (CC BY 4.0)}
}