Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Proposal to reject the text

Dates of application and transitional provisions for chemical products

Vote
Proposal to reject the text
Result
93 for · 431 against · 7 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
23 October 2025, 13:03
More facts (3)
Position
vote 1 of 2 on the decision
Official label
Proposal for rejection – Am 1
Vote id
180521
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 93 for, 431 against, 7 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 18 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 33Against 0Abst. 0No vote 13 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 38Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 14Against 78Abst. 5No vote 39 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.71
RenewFor 0Against 53Abst. 1No vote 21 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
EPPFor 0Against 139Abst. 0No vote 49 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 0Against 61Abst. 0No vote 18 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 6Against 59Abst. 0No vote 20 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
ESNFor 0Against 20Abst. 0No vote 7 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 2Against 21Abst. 1No vote 6 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria600
Belgium030
Czechia080
Spain030
France0270
Hungary010
Italy070
Netherlands060
Poland020
Portugal020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 531 members

No vote recorded, 188

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 188 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 May 2025Amendment 2, adding text after recital 8 — part 1 The role of gas storage for securing gas supplies ahead of the winter seasonAmendment94 for, 478 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.86 437 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 5, adding text after Article 1 Regulation (EU) 2017/1938 Article 6a (c), after paragraph 5 — part 1 The role of gas storage for securing gas supplies ahead of the winter seasonAmendment92 for, 472 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.85 433 voters
9 Oct 2025Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 7 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2024Amendment101 for, 497 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.85 466 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Mar 2026Amendment 17 to paragraph 16 Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2024Amendment98 for, 453 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.85 437 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 201 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment92 for, 545 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 14 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.84 492 voters
12 Feb 2026Amendment 23, adding text after paragraph 14 Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefireAmendment92 for, 427 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.84 411 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 176 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment94 for, 545 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.84 493 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 62 to paragraph 3 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment92 for, 488 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.83 445 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 1 to paragraph 45 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment117 for, 536 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.83 496 voters
12 Mar 2026Amendment 4 to Annex, point a Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029Amendment81 for, 468 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.83 435 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 2 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Proposal to reject the text — Dates of application and transitional provisions for chemical products”. Vote, 23 October 2025. votingId 180521. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-23/180521 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 23 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-23-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 23 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-23-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-23, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-10-23/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-10-23-180521,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Proposal to reject the text — Dates of application and transitional provisions for chemical products}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-10-23},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-23/180521}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-23/180521},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 180521. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-23-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-23-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-23 (CC BY 4.0)}
}