Skip to content

Decision

Dates of application and transitional provisions for chemical products

Effect
Passed
Result
441 for · 108 against · 11 abstained roll call
Date
23 October 2025, 13:03
Kind
New EU law · 1st reading
More facts (6)
Margin
by a large majority
Topics
Climate & environment Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
2 votes · 2 roll calls
Requested by
Greens (1 roll call)
Final vote
180519
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 441 for, 108 against, 11 abstained (roll call).

Passed by a large majority.

Parliament adopted its position on the law.

A proposal to reject the whole text was defeated first.

Backed by S&D, Renew, EPP, ECR, Patriots and ESN; opposed by The Left and Greens.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 2Against 32Abst. 0No vote 12 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.91
GreensFor 1Against 41Abst. 0No vote 11 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
S&DFor 75Against 17Abst. 9No vote 35 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.61
RenewFor 58Against 0Abst. 0No vote 17 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 144Against 2Abst. 0No vote 42 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
ECRFor 60Against 1Abst. 0No vote 18 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 63Against 6Abst. 0No vote 16 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.87
ESNFor 17Against 6Abst. 0No vote 4 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.61
No groupFor 21Against 3Abst. 2No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 44

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria613010.53
Belgium146020.55
Bulgaria140031.00
Cyprus2004—
Czechia191010.93
Germany57231150.56
Denmark85020.42
Estonia7000—
Spain4070130.78
Finland95010.46
France5199120.61
Greece53013—
Croatia6105—
Hungary20019—
Ireland102020.75
Italy39130240.63
Lithuania101000.86
Luxembourg5100—
Latvia7101—
Malta4002—
Netherlands177070.56
Poland4210100.97
Portugal153030.75
Romania2000131.00
Sweden134040.65
Slovenia6201—
Slovakia130110.89

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 560 members

All votes on this decision, 2

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Proposal to reject the text Proposal for rejection – Am 1 Roll call93 for, 431 against, 7 abstained Rejected
2Final vote Commission proposal Roll call441 for, 108 against, 11 abstained Adopted

Roll call requested by Greens.

Text

The text voted on.

Parliament’s vote records link no text to this decision.

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 5 connections: Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Dates of application and transitional provisions for chemical products”. Decision, 23 October 2025. votingId 180519. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-10-23/1 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 23 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-23-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 23 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-23-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-23, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-10-23/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2025-10-23-1,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Dates of application and transitional provisions for chemical products}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-10-23},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-10-23/1}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-10-23/1},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 180519. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-23-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-23-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-23 (CC BY 4.0)}
}