Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Separate vote: paragraph 10

Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiations

Vote
Separate vote: paragraph 10
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 22 Oct 2025
Result
381 for · 236 against · 25 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
22 October 2025, 15:00
More facts (6)
Position
vote 7 of 32 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Members
Official label
A10-0177/2025 – Sandro Gozi – § 10
Text
Report A-10-2025-0177
Dossier
2025/2041(INI)
Vote id
180161
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 381 for, 236 against, 25 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 59 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 13Against 24Abst. 2No vote 7 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.42
GreensFor 48Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 106Against 3Abst. 7No vote 20 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.87
RenewFor 64Against 8Abst. 0No vote 3 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.83
EPPFor 140Against 29Abst. 1No vote 18 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.74
ECRFor 0Against 61Abst. 5No vote 13 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.89
PatriotsFor 6Against 74Abst. 0No vote 5 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.89
ESNFor 0Against 22Abst. 1No vote 4 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
No groupFor 4Against 15Abst. 9No vote 2 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria100
Belgium200
Czechia100
Germany1400
Denmark300
Spain400
Finland200
France400
Croatia100
Italy300
Lithuania100
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands600
Sweden300
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 642 members

No vote recorded, 77

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 77 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
25 Nov 2025Paragraph 9 — part 1 Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)Split vote388 for, 221 against, 27 abstained Adopted For 61 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.84 582 voters
12 Mar 2025Paragraph 58 — part 3 White paper on the future of European defenceSplit vote373 for, 279 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 55 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.82 604 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 116 to Article 7, paragraph 9 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment369 for, 199 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.82 518 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
2 Apr 2025Paragraph 49 — part 4 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024Split vote369 for, 269 against, 23 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.81 589 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 123 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment376 for, 195 against, 2 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.80 515 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 120 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment361 for, 209 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.80 517 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 118 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment371 for, 194 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.80 512 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 119 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment357 for, 206 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by Patriots, Greensr · shared0.80 510 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 121 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment358 for, 208 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.80 514 voters
24 Nov 2025Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the PPE, S&D, Renew and Verts/ALE groups — Ukraine (resolution) Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PPE, S&D, Renew and Verts/ALE groups – Ukraine (resolution)Other301 for, 103 against, 33 abstained Adopted For 69 %r · shared0.80 402 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-22/180161
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Separate vote: paragraph 10 — Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiations”. Vote, 22 October 2025. votingId 180161, reference 2025/2041(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-22/180161 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 22 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-22-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 22 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-22-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-22, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-10-22/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-10-22-180161,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Separate vote: paragraph 10 — Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiations}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-10-22},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-22/180161}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-22/180161},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 180161, reference 2025/2041(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-22-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-22-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-22 (CC BY 4.0)}
}