Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 4 — part 5

Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiations

Vote
Paragraph 4 — part 5
Result
344 for · 227 against · 45 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
22 October 2025, 15:00
More facts (6)
Position
vote 5 of 32 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Members · split vote: Members
Official label
A10-0177/2025 – Sandro Gozi – § 4/5
Vote id
180159
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 344 for, 227 against, 45 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 56 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “takes note of the cumbersome and outdated structure and governance of the EU budget and the possible redistribution in the allocation of agricultural and cohesion funds; recalls that EU enlargement is an opportunity to recalibrate key EU policies in this respect;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 4Against 24Abst. 12No vote 6 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.40
GreensFor 46Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 94Against 7Abst. 6No vote 29 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.82
RenewFor 58Against 7Abst. 5No vote 5 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.74
EPPFor 129Against 22Abst. 10No vote 27 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.70
ECRFor 5Against 58Abst. 0No vote 16 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
PatriotsFor 3Against 67Abst. 10No vote 5 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.76
ESNFor 0Against 23Abst. 0No vote 4 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 5Against 19Abst. 2No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium011
Cyprus010
Germany031
Denmark100
Spain030
Finland300
France090
Greece012
Ireland020
Italy008
Portugal020
Sweden020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 616 members

No vote recorded, 103

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 103 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
21 Jan 2026Paragraph 93 — part 2 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025Split vote394 for, 241 against, 30 abstained Adopted For 59 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.82 573 voters
23 Oct 2025Separate vote on paragraph 85 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Separate vote357 for, 200 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 534 voters
25 Nov 2025Recital J — part 1 Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)Split vote411 for, 202 against, 23 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.81 560 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Oct 2025Paragraph 9 — part 3 United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructureSplit vote356 for, 218 against, 39 abstained Adopted For 58 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.81 537 voters
21 Jan 2026Paragraph 38 — part 2 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2025Split vote389 for, 234 against, 38 abstained Adopted For 59 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.81 572 voters
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 101 — part 5 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldSplit vote431 for, 181 against, 52 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.81 567 voters
11 Mar 2026Final vote — text as a whole European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026Final392 for, 219 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 62 %r · shared0.81 536 voters
21 Jan 2026Paragraph 49 — part 2 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2025Split vote380 for, 258 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 58 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.81 568 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 121 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment358 for, 208 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.80 491 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 120 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment361 for, 209 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.80 494 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 4 — part 5 — Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiations”. Vote, 22 October 2025. votingId 180159, reference 2025/2041(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-22/180159 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 22 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-22-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 22 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-22-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-22, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-10-22/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-10-22-180159,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 4 — part 5 — Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiations}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-10-22},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-22/180159}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-22/180159},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 180159, reference 2025/2041(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-22-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-22-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-22 (CC BY 4.0)}
}