Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 4 — part 4

Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiations

Vote
Paragraph 4 — part 4
Result
326 for · 272 against · 29 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
22 October 2025, 15:00
More facts (6)
Position
vote 4 of 32 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Members · split vote: Members
Official label
A10-0177/2025 – Sandro Gozi – § 4/4
Vote id
180158
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 326 for, 272 against, 29 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 52 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “recalls that Article 49 TEU enables a move to QMV without requiring Treaty changes;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 4Against 20Abst. 11No vote 11 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.36
GreensFor 48Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 97Against 6Abst. 7No vote 26 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.82
RenewFor 64Against 7Abst. 0No vote 4 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.85
EPPFor 110Against 52Abst. 4No vote 22 of 188Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.49
ECRFor 1Against 63Abst. 3No vote 12 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.91
PatriotsFor 0Against 80Abst. 0No vote 5 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 23Abst. 0No vote 4 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 2Against 21Abst. 4No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

S&D members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria400
Belgium400
Bulgaria010
Cyprus010
Germany1110
Denmark300
Estonia200
Spain1900
Finland200
France1200
Greece001
Croatia001
Ireland100
Italy1600
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Malta030
Netherlands400
Poland200
Portugal500
Romania700
Sweden005
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 627 members

No vote recorded, 92

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 92 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
21 Jan 2026Paragraph 80 — part 2 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2025Split vote347 for, 289 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 53 %Requested by EPP, ECR, Patriotsr · shared0.89 570 voters
2 Apr 2025Paragraph 45 — part 3 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024Split vote339 for, 299 against, 32 abstained Adopted For 51 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.88 584 voters
2 Apr 2025Paragraph 45 — part 4 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024Split vote369 for, 267 against, 41 abstained Adopted For 55 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.88 590 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Separate vote on paragraph 84 2023 and 2024 reports on UkraineSeparate vote335 for, 272 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 53 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.87 552 voters
25 Nov 2025Recital J — part 2 Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)Split vote366 for, 245 against, 30 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.87 572 voters
25 Nov 2025Final vote — text as a whole Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)Final330 for, 273 against, 38 abstained Adopted For 51 %r · shared0.86 573 voters
25 Nov 2025Separate vote on recital K Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)Separate vote329 for, 277 against, 41 abstained Adopted For 51 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.86 582 voters
25 Nov 2025Paragraph 8 — part 2 Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)Split vote320 for, 291 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 50 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.86 573 voters
25 Nov 2025Paragraph 12 — part 1 Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)Split vote385 for, 226 against, 35 abstained Adopted For 60 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.85 576 voters
2 Apr 2025Paragraph 44 — part 2 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024Split vote381 for, 275 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.85 588 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 4 — part 4 — Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiations”. Vote, 22 October 2025. votingId 180158, reference 2025/2041(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-22/180158 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 22 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-22-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 22 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-22-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-22, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-10-22/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-10-22-180158,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 4 — part 4 — Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiations}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-10-22},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-22/180158}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-22/180158},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 180158, reference 2025/2041(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-22-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-22-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-22 (CC BY 4.0)}
}