Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 10 — part 1

Second World Summit for Social Development

Vote
Paragraph 10 — part 1
Decision
No. 10 of the sitting of 9 Oct 2025
Result
409 for · 125 against · 73 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
9 October 2025, 13:31
More facts (6)
Position
vote 13 of 25 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: EPP · split vote: EPP · separate vote: EPP
Official label
B10-0408/2025 – § 10/1
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0408
Dossier
2025/2654(RSP)
Vote id
179603
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 409 for, 125 against, 73 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 67 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘and reiterates the call for new legal initiatives on AI and algorithmic management in the workplace, as well as on the right to disconnect;’”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 39Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 45Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 94Against 0Abst. 0No vote 42 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 49Against 10Abst. 1No vote 15 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.72
EPPFor 161Against 9Abst. 1No vote 17 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.91
ECRFor 5Against 12Abst. 52No vote 10 of 79Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.63
PatriotsFor 1Against 63Abst. 14No vote 7 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.71
ESNFor 1Against 23Abst. 1No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
No groupFor 14Against 8Abst. 4No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria030
Czechia100
Germany0140
France010
Hungary010
Lithuania001
Poland020
Slovakia020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 607 members

No vote recorded, 112

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 112 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
21 May 2026Paragraph 18 — part 2 The need to reduce work-related fatalitiesSplit vote303 for, 165 against, 5 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by The Left, Patriotsr · shared0.84 410 voters
11 Mar 2025Final vote — text as a whole European Social Fund Plus post-2027Final432 for, 155 against, 82 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.84 566 voters
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 17 — part 2 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote440 for, 156 against, 25 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.81 531 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
23 Oct 2024Final vote Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member StatesFinal444 for, 179 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 69 %r · shared0.81 548 voters
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 101 — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote449 for, 141 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.81 543 voters
19 Jun 2025Paragraph 13 — part 2 Electricity grids: the backbone of the EU energy systemSplit vote403 for, 168 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.81 503 voters
18 Jun 2025Recital G — part 2 Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience FacilitySplit vote418 for, 200 against, 35 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.81 561 voters
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 108 — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote419 for, 198 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.81 529 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 22 — part 1 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategySplit vote377 for, 166 against, 35 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.81 496 voters
23 Oct 2024Amendment 1 — part 2 Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member StatesAmendment430 for, 188 against, 22 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.81 544 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-09/179603
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 10 — part 1 — Second World Summit for Social Development”. Vote, 9 October 2025. votingId 179603, reference 2025/2654(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-09/179603 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-09-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 9 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-09-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-09, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-10-09/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-10-09-179603,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 10 — part 1 — Second World Summit for Social Development}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-10-09},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-09/179603}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-09/179603},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 179603, reference 2025/2654(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-09-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-09-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-09 (CC BY 4.0)}
}