Vote · Roll call

Amendment 1 to paragraph 49

Role of cohesion policy in supporting the just transition

Vote: Amendment 1 to paragraph 49
Decision: No. 10 of the sitting of 10 Sept 2025
Result: 328 for · 306 against · 27 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date: 10 September 2025, 14:23

More facts (6)

Position: vote 1 of 3 on the decision
Requested by: roll call: Renew
Official label: A10-0137/2025 - Ciaran Mullooly - § 49 - Am 1
Text: Report A-10-2025-0137
Dossier: 2024/2121(INI)
Vote id: 178778

Position: vote 1 of 3 on the decision
Requested by: roll call: Renew
Official label: A10-0137/2025 - Ciaran Mullooly - § 49 - Am 1
Text: Report A-10-2025-0137
Dossier: 2024/2121(INI)
Vote id: 178778

Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP)

Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Adopted · 50 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. **No vote**: in office that day, no position recorded. **Majority line**: the most common position. **Clear line**: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. **Cohesion**: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
Group	For	Against	Abst.	No vote	Majority line	Clear line	Cohesion
The Left	For 36	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 10 of 46	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
Greens	For 48	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 5 of 53	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
S&D	For 126	Against 0	Abst. 1	No vote 9 of 136	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.99
Renew	For 56	Against 8	Abst. 4	No vote 7 of 75	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.74
EPP	For 10	Against 165	Abst. 0	No vote 13 of 188	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.91
ECR	For 24	Against 30	Abst. 17	No vote 8 of 79	Majority line Against	Clear line Divided	Cohesion 0.13
Patriots	For 8	Against 72	Abst. 0	No vote 5 of 85	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.85
ESN	For 0	Against 26	Abst. 0	No vote 1 of 27	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 1.00
No group	For 20	Against 5	Abst. 5	No vote 0 of 30	Majority line —	Clear line No line	Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Each cell: members of that country in that group who voted for – against – abstained (group at the date of the vote). Shading: the share of the cell's votes that were for; the stronger the shading, the more for (scale below). — : no member voted.
Country	The Left	Greens	S&D	Renew	EPP	ECR	Patriots	ESN	No group
Austria	no member voted	2–0–0	5–0–0	2–0–0	0–5–0	no member voted	0–6–0	no member voted	no member voted
Belgium	2–0–0	2–0–0	4–0–0	4–0–0	0–3–0	0–1–0	0–3–0	no member voted	no member voted
Bulgaria	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0	3–0–0	0–5–0	1–0–0	no member voted	0–3–0	2–0–0
Cyprus	1–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted	0–2–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Czechia	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	4–1–0	3–0–0	8–1–0	0–1–0	2–0–0
Germany	4–0–0	14–0–0	13–0–0	3–5–0	0–30–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–15–0	9–0–0
Denmark	1–0–0	3–0–0	3–0–0	3–0–0	0–2–0	0–1–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted
Estonia	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	1–0–0	0–2–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Spain	2–0–0	3–0–0	20–0–0	1–0–0	1–20–0	2–0–0	0–5–0	no member voted	0–1–0
Finland	3–0–0	1–0–0	1–0–1	3–0–0	0–3–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
France	7–0–0	4–0–0	11–0–0	13–0–0	0–6–0	0–4–0	0–28–0	0–1–0	0–1–0
Greece	4–0–0	no member voted	3–0–0	no member voted	1–5–0	0–0–1	0–1–0	no member voted	2–0–2
Croatia	no member voted	1–0–0	4–0–0	no member voted	0–6–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Hungary	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	no member voted	0–6–0	no member voted	0–11–0	0–1–0	no member voted
Ireland	2–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0	5–0–0	3–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Italy	8–0–0	3–0–0	18–0–0	no member voted	0–8–0	4–18–0	0–7–0	no member voted	no member voted
Lithuania	no member voted	1–0–0	2–0–0	1–0–0	0–3–0	2–0–0	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted
Luxembourg	no member voted	1–0–0	1–0–0	1–0–0	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Latvia	no member voted	1–0–0	1–0–0	1–0–0	0–2–0	3–0–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted
Malta	no member voted	no member voted	3–0–0	no member voted	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Netherlands	no member voted	6–0–0	3–0–0	4–0–2	0–6–0	1–0–0	0–5–0	no member voted	no member voted
Poland	no member voted	no member voted	3–0–0	1–0–0	0–20–0	2–1–15	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–0–1
Portugal	no member voted	no member voted	7–0–0	0–0–2	1–5–0	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted
Romania	no member voted	1–0–0	11–0–0	3–0–0	0–10–0	4–1–1	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0
Sweden	2–0–0	3–0–0	5–0–0	0–3–0	0–5–0	0–3–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovenia	no member voted	1–0–0	1–0–0	2–0–0	0–5–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovakia	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	5–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	3–1–2

Share for: 0–19 %20–39 %40–59 %60–79 %80–100 %

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
Country	For	Against
Austria	0	5
Belgium	0	3
Bulgaria	0	5
Cyprus	0	2
Czechia	4	1
Germany	0	30
Denmark	0	2
Estonia	0	2
Spain	1	20
Finland	0	3
France	0	6
Greece	1	5
Croatia	0	6
Hungary	0	6
Ireland	3	1
Italy	0	8
Lithuania	0	3
Luxembourg	0	2
Latvia	0	2
Malta	0	2
Netherlands	0	6
Poland	0	20
Portugal	1	5
Romania	0	10
Sweden	0	5
Slovenia	0	5

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 661 members

No vote recorded, 58

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 58 members

Name · group that day · country

Aldo PATRICIELLO group that day: Patriots · Italy
André FRANQUEIRA RODRIGUES group that day: S&D · Portugal
Anja HAZEKAMP group that day: The Left · Netherlands
Annalisa CORRADO group that day: S&D · Italy
Anouk VAN BRUG group that day: Renew · Netherlands
Antonio LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE group that day: EPP · Spain
Benedetta SCUDERI group that day: Greens · Italy
Billy KELLEHER group that day: Renew · Ireland
Catarina MARTINS group that day: The Left · Portugal
Christine SCHNEIDER group that day: EPP · Germany
Claire FITA group that day: S&D · France
Dainius ŽALIMAS group that day: Renew · Lithuania
Dario NARDELLA group that day: S&D · Italy
Delara BURKHARDT group that day: S&D · Germany
Diana RIBA I GINER group that day: Greens · Spain
Dimitris TSIODRAS group that day: EPP · Greece
Emma FOURREAU group that day: The Left · France
Eva MAYDELL group that day: EPP · Bulgaria
Fulvio MARTUSCIELLO group that day: EPP · Italy
Galato ALEXANDRAKI group that day: ECR · Greece
Giuseppe MILAZZO group that day: ECR · Italy
Hanna GRONKIEWICZ-WALTZ group that day: EPP · Poland
Hélder SOUSA SILVA group that day: EPP · Portugal
Irene MONTERO group that day: The Left · Spain
Isabel SERRA SÁNCHEZ group that day: The Left · Spain
Jagna MARCZUŁAJTIS-WALCZAK group that day: EPP · Poland
Jana TOOM group that day: Renew · Estonia
João OLIVEIRA group that day: The Left · Portugal
Johan VAN OVERTVELDT group that day: ECR · Belgium
Jorge MARTÍN FRÍAS group that day: Patriots · Spain
Jutta PAULUS group that day: Greens · Germany
Kris VAN DIJCK group that day: ECR · Belgium
Lara WOLTERS group that day: S&D · Netherlands
Ľudovít ÓDOR group that day: Renew · Slovakia
Lynn BOYLAN group that day: The Left · Ireland
Majdouline SBAI group that day: Greens · France
Maria OHISALO group that day: Greens · Finland
Matteo RICCI group that day: S&D · Italy
Matthieu VALET group that day: Patriots · France
Michał DWORCZYK group that day: ECR · Poland
Michał WAWRYKIEWICZ group that day: EPP · Poland
Mika AALTOLA group that day: EPP · Finland
Mimmo LUCANO group that day: The Left · Italy
Miriam LEXMANN group that day: EPP · Slovakia
Paolo INSELVINI group that day: ECR · Italy
Pasquale TRIDICO group that day: The Left · Italy
Péter MAGYAR group that day: EPP · Hungary
Rima HASSAN group that day: The Left · France
Roberta METSOLA group that day: EPP · Malta
Sebastiaan STÖTELER group that day: Patriots · Netherlands
Sebastian TYNKKYNEN group that day: ECR · Finland
Sigrid FRIIS group that day: Renew · Denmark
Sophie WILMÈS group that day: Renew · Belgium
Stanisław TYSZKA group that day: ESN · Poland
Thomas PELLERIN-CARLIN group that day: S&D · France
Tiago MOREIRA DE SÁ group that day: Patriots · Portugal
Tsvetelina PENKOVA group that day: S&D · Bulgaria
Waldemar BUDA group that day: ECR · Poland

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
22 May 2025	Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 2 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023	Amendment	264 for, 252 against, 76 abstained Adopted	For 45 %	Requested by Greens	r · shared0.84 553 voters
12 Feb 2026	Separate vote on paragraph 64 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy	Separate vote	253 for, 317 against, 9 abstained Rejected	For 44 %	Requested by S&D	r · shared0.83 534 voters
12 Feb 2026	Separate vote on paragraph 65 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy	Separate vote	253 for, 320 against, 8 abstained Rejected	For 44 %	Requested by S&D	r · shared0.82 536 voters

Show 7 more

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
12 Mar 2025	Paragraph 25 — part 1 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025	Split vote	340 for, 274 against, 60 abstained Adopted	For 50 %	Requested by S&D	r · shared0.82 619 voters
17 Sept 2026	Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders	Amendment	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained Rejected	For 46 %	Requested by S&D	r · shared0.82 546 voters
17 Sept 2026	Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders	Amendment	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained Rejected	For 44 %	Requested by Greens	r · shared0.82 543 voters
12 Feb 2026	Separate vote on paragraph 17 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy	Separate vote	247 for, 291 against, 43 abstained Rejected	For 43 %	Requested by The Left, S&D	r · shared0.82 536 voters
17 Jun 2025	Separate vote on paragraph 42 Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville	Separate vote	290 for, 357 against, 17 abstained Rejected	For 44 %	Requested by S&D, Renew	r · shared0.82 618 voters
17 Jun 2025	Separate vote on paragraph 69 Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville	Separate vote	291 for, 356 against, 16 abstained Rejected	For 44 %	Requested by S&D	r · shared0.82 617 voters
17 Jun 2025	Separate vote on paragraph 24 Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville	Separate vote	278 for, 371 against, 15 abstained Rejected	For 42 %	Requested by S&D, Renew	r · shared0.81 618 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 2 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Decision Role of cohesion policy in supporting the just transition Resolution · report by Ciaran Mullooly 10 Sept 2025 Adopted

Other votes on this decision

Vote Role of cohesion policy in supporting the just transition — Final vote — text as a whole Roll-call vote · 10 Sept 2025 10 Sept 2025 Adopted

See all

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-10/178778
Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 September 2025 (European Parliament)
Results of votes, sitting of 10 September 2025 (European Parliament)
Data source: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-10
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 1 to paragraph 49 — Role of cohesion policy in supporting the just transition”. Vote, 10 September 2025. votingId 178778, reference 2024/2121(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-10/178778 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-09-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).

BibTeX

@misc{epw-vote-2025-09-10-178778,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 1 to paragraph 49 — Role of cohesion policy in supporting the just transition}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-09-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-10/178778}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-10/178778},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 178778, reference 2024/2121(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}