Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Decision

Role of cohesion policy in supporting the just transition

Effect
Adopted
Result
519 for · 99 against · 48 abstained roll call
Date
10 September 2025, 14:23–14:24
Kind
Resolution
More facts (9)
Margin
by a large majority
Text
Report A-10-2025-0137
Dossier
2024/2121(INI)
Source
Committee report by Ciaran Mullooly
Topics
EU budget & fundsJobs, social affairs & equalityClimate & environment Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
3 votes · 2 roll calls · 1 amendment
Requested by
Renew (1 roll call) · Members (1 separate vote)
Sitting
Wednesday 10 September 2025
Final vote
178389
More
Cite this page Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page
Votes on this decision
Members on the final vote

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 519 for, 99 against, 48 abstained (roll call).

Adopted by a large majority.

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 1 amendment (1 adopted) and 1 part of the text voted on separately (1 adopted).

Backed by The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP and ECR; opposed by Patriots and ESN.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 34Against 0Abst. 1No vote 11 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 48Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 128Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 67Against 1Abst. 0No vote 7 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 174Against 0Abst. 3No vote 11 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
ECRFor 40Against 11Abst. 22No vote 6 of 79Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.32
PatriotsFor 7Against 55Abst. 19No vote 4 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.52
ESNFor 0Against 25Abst. 1No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 21Against 7Abst. 2No vote 0 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 32

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria146000.55
Belgium154030.68
Bulgaria123020.70
Cyprus6000—
Czechia152400.57
Germany7515060.75
Denmark121110.79
Estonia5101—
Spain506040.84
Finland120031.00
France4433040.36
Greece145110.55
Croatia120001.00
Hungary811110.33
Ireland120021.00
Italy590890.82
Lithuania90110.85
Luxembourg6000—
Latvia8100—
Malta5001—
Netherlands225040.72
Poland2551850.28
Portugal162030.83
Romania303000.86
Sweden174000.71
Slovenia6030—
Slovakia102120.65

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 666 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. Speeches: how many times they took the floor. Final vote: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Sabine VERHEYEN GermanyEPPSpeeches110 Sept 2025 (verbatim report, official site) For

All votes on this decision, 3

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Amendment 1 to paragraph 49 A10-0137/2025 - Ciaran Mullooly - § 49 - Am 1 Roll call328 for, 306 against, 27 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew
2Separate vote on recital N Counted418 for, 189 against, 43 abstained AdoptedRequested byseparate: Members
3Final vote — text as a whole A10-0137/2025 - Ciaran Mullooly - Proposition de résolution (ensemble du texte) Roll call519 for, 99 against, 48 abstained Adopted

Roll call requested by Renew · separate votes by Members.

Text

The text voted on.

Report A-10-2025-0137

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament adopted a resolution on the role of cohesion policy in supporting the just transition.

The resolution examines the implementation of the EU Just Transition Fund and proposes measures to improve its effectiveness in helping regions and workers affected by the shift to a carbon-neutral economy.

It calls for simplifying rules, establishing a post-2027 Just Transition Fund with greater resources, and ensuring that justice for workers is central to the transition.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

This resolution on the role of cohesion policy in supporting the just transition calls for measures to help regions affected by job losses, including special economic zones, training, and support for workers.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2024/2121(INI) · Own-initiative report

The role of cohesion policy in supporting the just transition

Parliament adopted the text on 10 September 2025. This is its final position on the matter.

Show the 5 steps of the dossier
  1. Referred to committee · 23 January 2025 (done)
  2. Committee work · Report adopted 25 June 2025 (done)
  3. Tabled for plenary · 9 July 2025 (done)
  4. Plenary vote · Adopted 10 September 2025 (done)
  5. Parliament’s position · Final (done)

Lead committee: REGI · Author: Ciaran MULLOOLY (Renew)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 14 connections: Running issue: EU climate neutrality · Other decisions of the part-session on REGI dossiers · Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Running issue: EU climate neutrality

Other decisions of the part-session on REGI dossiers

See all: Other decisions of the part-session on REGI dossiers

Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-09-10/10
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Role of cohesion policy in supporting the just transition”. Decision, 10 September 2025. votingId 178389, document A-10-2025-0137, reference 2024/2121(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-09-10/10 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-09-10/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-decision-2025-09-10-10,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Role of cohesion policy in supporting the just transition}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-09-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-09-10/10}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-09-10/10},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 178389, document A-10-2025-0137, reference 2024/2121(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}