Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 1, after recital N

Public procurement

Vote
Amendment 1, after recital N
Decision
No. 7 of the sitting of 9 Sept 2025
Result
307 for · 280 against · 53 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
9 September 2025, 14:08
More facts (6)
Position
vote 75 of 90 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - Après le considérant N - Am 1
Text
Report A-10-2025-0147
Dossier
2024/2103(INI)
Vote id
178682
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 307 for, 280 against, 53 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 48 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 35Against 0Abst. 0No vote 11 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 47Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 114Against 1Abst. 0No vote 21 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 1Against 53Abst. 12No vote 9 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.70
EPPFor 13Against 157Abst. 3No vote 15 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
ECRFor 4Against 41Abst. 22No vote 12 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.42
PatriotsFor 68Against 1Abst. 13No vote 3 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.74
ESNFor 3Against 22Abst. 1No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.77
No groupFor 22Against 5Abst. 2No vote 1 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium200
Czechia100
Germany1400
Denmark300
Spain300
Finland100
France400
Croatia100
Italy200
Lithuania100
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands600
Romania100
Sweden300
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 640 members

No vote recorded, 79

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 79 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
14 Nov 2024Amendment 5 to recital G EU actions against the Russian shadow fleets and ensuring a full enforcement of sanctions against RussiaAmendment252 for, 318 against, 64 abstained Rejected For 40 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 562 voters
8 Oct 2025Amendment 146 to recital 15 Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chainAmendment263 for, 299 against, 71 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.79 577 voters
12 Mar 2025Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 69 White paper on the future of European defenceAmendment303 for, 316 against, 62 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.79 606 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Feb 2026Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 9 European Central Bank – annual report 2025Amendment328 for, 281 against, 40 abstained Adopted For 51 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.79 583 voters
12 Mar 2026Amendment 40 to paragraph 19 — part 1 Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2024Amendment291 for, 201 against, 73 abstained Adopted For 52 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.77 508 voters
23 Jan 2025Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 4 Case of Jean-Jacques Wondo in the Democratic Republic of the CongoAmendment272 for, 290 against, 46 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.77 545 voters
21 Jan 2026Amendment 37, adding text after paragraph 78 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025Amendment253 for, 361 against, 49 abstained Rejected For 38 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.76 595 voters
7 Jul 2026Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 46 Competition policy – annual report 2025Amendment139 for, 369 against, 144 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.76 578 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 45 2023 and 2024 reports on UkraineAmendment191 for, 296 against, 143 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.76 617 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 3, adding text after recital W 2023 and 2024 reports on UkraineAmendment255 for, 252 against, 132 abstained Adopted For 40 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.76 626 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178682
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 1, after recital N — Public procurement”. Vote, 9 September 2025. votingId 178682, reference 2024/2103(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178682 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 9 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-09, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-09-09/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-09-09-178682,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 1, after recital N — Public procurement}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-09-09},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178682}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178682},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 178682, reference 2024/2103(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-09 (CC BY 4.0)}
}