Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 18, after paragraph 69

White paper on the future of European defence

Vote
Amendment 18, after paragraph 69
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 12 Mar 2025
Result
303 for · 316 against · 62 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
12 March 2025, 13:11
More facts (6)
Position
vote 143 of 194 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens
Official label
RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 69 – Am 18
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0151
Dossier
2025/2565(RSP)
Vote id
172827
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 303 for, 316 against, 62 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 44 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 40Against 4Abst. 0No vote 2 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.86
GreensFor 50Against 0Abst. 1No vote 2 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 129Against 3Abst. 2No vote 2 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
RenewFor 5Against 65Abst. 1No vote 4 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.87
EPPFor 11Against 160Abst. 5No vote 12 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
ECRFor 2Against 47Abst. 24No vote 7 of 80Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.47
PatriotsFor 47Against 12Abst. 23No vote 4 of 86Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.36
ESNFor 0Against 20Abst. 3No vote 3 of 26Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.80
No groupFor 19Against 5Abst. 3No vote 2 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Cyprus100
Germany400
Denmark010
Spain400
Finland300
France800
Greece400
Ireland300
Italy900
Netherlands010
Portugal200
Sweden020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 681 members

No vote recorded, 38

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 38 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment250 for, 391 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.83 614 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 39 Public procurementAmendment254 for, 327 against, 66 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 612 voters
14 Nov 2024Amendment 5 to recital G EU actions against the Russian shadow fleets and ensuring a full enforcement of sanctions against RussiaAmendment252 for, 318 against, 64 abstained Rejected For 40 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 605 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Amendment 7 to paragraph 36 Public procurementAmendment261 for, 365 against, 22 abstained Rejected For 40 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 613 voters
19 Sept 2024Amendment 4 to paragraph 6 The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in CubaAmendment241 for, 345 against, 30 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.80 588 voters
21 Jan 2026Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 4 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025Amendment198 for, 383 against, 62 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.80 602 voters
18 Jun 2026Amendment 13, adding text after recital A Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAmendment238 for, 315 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.79 524 voters
22 Jan 2026Amendment 5, adding text after recital A Presidential elections in Honduras, the non-recognition of the outcome by the incumbent administration and the attacks on opposition members of the National AssemblyAmendment215 for, 362 against, 39 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.79 580 voters
18 Jun 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 1 Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAmendment206 for, 319 against, 28 abstained Rejected For 37 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.79 513 voters
18 Jun 2026Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 1 Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAmendment202 for, 330 against, 36 abstained Rejected For 36 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.79 528 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172827
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 18, after paragraph 69 — White paper on the future of European defence”. Vote, 12 March 2025. votingId 172827, reference 2025/2565(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172827 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-03-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-03-12-172827,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 18, after paragraph 69 — White paper on the future of European defence}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-03-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172827}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172827},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 172827, reference 2025/2565(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}