Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Recital E — part 3 of 3

Public procurement

Vote
Recital E — part 3 of 3
Result
481 for · 157 against · 4 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
9 September 2025, 14:07
More facts (6)
Position
vote 71 of 90 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR · split vote: Patriots, ECR
Official label
A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - Considérant E/3
Vote id
178679
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 481 for, 157 against, 4 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 75 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “environmental and”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 35Against 0Abst. 0No vote 11 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 47Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 117Against 0Abst. 0No vote 19 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 65Against 1Abst. 0No vote 9 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 173Against 1Abst. 0No vote 14 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 0Against 67Abst. 0No vote 12 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 28Against 54Abst. 0No vote 3 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.49
ESNFor 0Against 24Abst. 1No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 16Against 10Abst. 3No vote 1 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria200
Cyprus100
Czechia020
Germany900
Spain010
France100
Greece210
Luxembourg010
Poland010
Romania020
Slovakia123

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 642 members

No vote recorded, 77

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 77 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point ab — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote404 for, 139 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 73 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.95 489 voters
19 Sept 2024Separate vote on recital C The devastating floods in central and eastern Europe, the loss of lives and the EU’s preparedness to act on such disasters exacerbated by climate changeSeparate vote456 for, 112 against, 38 abstained Adopted For 75 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.92 547 voters
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 55 — part 2 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote432 for, 137 against, 41 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 543 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
19 Sept 2024Paragraph 4 — part 1 The devastating floods in central and eastern Europe, the loss of lives and the EU’s preparedness to act on such disasters exacerbated by climate changeSplit vote429 for, 120 against, 55 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.91 546 voters
21 Jan 2026Paragraph 14 — part 3 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025Split vote467 for, 150 against, 45 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.90 593 voters
23 Oct 2025Separate vote on paragraph 55 Key objectives for the CITES COP20 meeting in UzbekistanSeparate vote378 for, 127 against, 63 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.90 511 voters
28 Apr 2026Paragraph 28 — part 1 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUSplit vote491 for, 111 against, 51 abstained Adopted For 75 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.90 584 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 9 The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equalityAmendment489 for, 142 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 76 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.90 567 voters
20 May 2026Paragraph 19 — part 2 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseSplit vote463 for, 151 against, 28 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 574 voters
20 May 2026Separate vote on citation 11 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseSeparate vote464 for, 134 against, 30 abstained Adopted For 74 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.89 561 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Recital E — part 3 of 3 — Public procurement”. Vote, 9 September 2025. votingId 178679, reference 2024/2103(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178679 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 9 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-09, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-09-09/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-09-09-178679,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Recital E — part 3 of 3 — Public procurement}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-09-09},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178679}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178679},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 178679, reference 2024/2103(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-09 (CC BY 4.0)}
}