Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 24, after paragraph 63

Public procurement

Vote
Amendment 24, after paragraph 63
Result
255 for · 361 against · 33 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
9 September 2025, 14:03
More facts (6)
Position
vote 44 of 90 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens
Official label
A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - Après le § 63 - Am 24
Vote id
178651
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 255 for, 361 against, 33 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 39 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 35Against 0Abst. 0No vote 11 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 47Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 125Against 0Abst. 0No vote 11 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 20Against 45Abst. 0No vote 10 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.54
EPPFor 1Against 170Abst. 0No vote 17 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 1Against 68Abst. 0No vote 10 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 5Against 48Abst. 29No vote 3 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.38
ESNFor 1Against 24Abst. 1No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
No groupFor 20Against 6Abst. 3No vote 1 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria030
Czechia010
Germany0150
France010
Hungary100
Lithuania001
Poland020
Slovakia020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 649 members

No vote recorded, 70

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 70 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
19 Sept 2024Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 6 The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in CubaAmendment231 for, 326 against, 58 abstained Rejected For 38 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.90 560 voters
18 Jun 2026Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 4 Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAmendment215 for, 313 against, 38 abstained Rejected For 38 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.89 505 voters
1 Apr 2025Amendment 33, adding text after recital 28 Macro-financial assistance to EgyptAmendment232 for, 389 against, 49 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.88 607 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Amendment 61, adding text after recital C The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 37 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.88 519 voters
19 Sept 2024Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 6 The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in CubaAmendment219 for, 357 against, 41 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.88 562 voters
12 Feb 2026Recital D — part 2 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategySplit vote220 for, 319 against, 39 abstained Rejected For 38 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.87 523 voters
22 Jan 2026Amendment 5, adding text after recital A Presidential elections in Honduras, the non-recognition of the outcome by the incumbent administration and the attacks on opposition members of the National AssemblyAmendment215 for, 362 against, 39 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 561 voters
18 Jun 2026Amendment 13, adding text after recital A Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAmendment238 for, 315 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.87 501 voters
18 Jun 2026Amendment 14, adding text after recital F Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAmendment217 for, 319 against, 31 abstained Rejected For 38 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.87 506 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 4 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment231 for, 350 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.87 531 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 24, after paragraph 63 — Public procurement”. Vote, 9 September 2025. votingId 178651, reference 2024/2103(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178651 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 9 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-09, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-09-09/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-09-09-178651,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 24, after paragraph 63 — Public procurement}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-09-09},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178651}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178651},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 178651, reference 2024/2103(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-09 (CC BY 4.0)}
}