Vote · Roll call

Amendment 24, after paragraph 63

Public procurement

Vote: Amendment 24, after paragraph 63
Decision: No. 7 of the sitting of 9 Sept 2025
Result: 255 for · 361 against · 33 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date: 9 September 2025, 14:03

More facts (6)

Position: vote 44 of 90 on the decision
Requested by: roll call: Greens
Official label: A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - Après le § 63 - Am 24
Text: Report A-10-2025-0147
Dossier: 2024/2103(INI)
Vote id: 178651

Position: vote 44 of 90 on the decision
Requested by: roll call: Greens
Official label: A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - Après le § 63 - Am 24
Text: Report A-10-2025-0147
Dossier: 2024/2103(INI)
Vote id: 178651

Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP)

Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Rejected · 39 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. **No vote**: in office that day, no position recorded. **Majority line**: the most common position. **Clear line**: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. **Cohesion**: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
Group	For	Against	Abst.	No vote	Majority line	Clear line	Cohesion
The Left	For 35	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 11 of 46	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
Greens	For 47	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 6 of 53	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
S&D	For 125	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 11 of 136	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
Renew	For 20	Against 45	Abst. 0	No vote 10 of 75	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.54
EPP	For 1	Against 170	Abst. 0	No vote 17 of 188	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.99
ECR	For 1	Against 68	Abst. 0	No vote 10 of 79	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.98
Patriots	For 5	Against 48	Abst. 29	No vote 3 of 85	Majority line Against	Clear line Divided	Cohesion 0.38
ESN	For 1	Against 24	Abst. 1	No vote 1 of 27	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.88
No group	For 20	Against 6	Abst. 3	No vote 1 of 30	Majority line —	Clear line No line	Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Each cell: members of that country in that group who voted for – against – abstained (group at the date of the vote). Shading: the share of the cell's votes that were for; the stronger the shading, the more for (scale below). — : no member voted.
Country	The Left	Greens	S&D	Renew	EPP	ECR	Patriots	ESN	No group
Austria	no member voted	2–0–0	5–0–0	0–2–0	0–5–0	no member voted	5–1–0	no member voted	no member voted
Belgium	2–0–0	2–0–0	4–0–0	0–3–0	0–3–0	0–1–0	0–3–0	no member voted	no member voted
Bulgaria	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0	1–2–0	0–6–0	0–1–0	no member voted	0–3–0	2–0–0
Cyprus	1–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted	0–2–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–1–0
Czechia	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–5–0	0–3–0	0–8–0	0–1–0	2–0–0
Germany	4–0–0	14–0–0	12–0–0	0–8–0	0–28–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–15–0	8–0–1
Denmark	1–0–0	3–0–0	3–0–0	0–3–0	0–2–0	0–1–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted
Estonia	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Spain	1–0–0	3–0–0	20–0–0	1–0–0	0–20–0	0–2–0	0–6–0	no member voted	0–1–0
Finland	3–0–0	1–0–0	2–0–0	0–3–0	1–3–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
France	6–0–0	4–0–0	12–0–0	11–0–0	0–6–0	0–4–0	0–0–29	0–1–0	0–1–0
Greece	4–0–0	no member voted	3–0–0	no member voted	0–7–0	1–0–0	0–1–0	no member voted	1–1–1
Croatia	no member voted	1–0–0	4–0–0	no member voted	0–6–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Hungary	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	no member voted	0–6–0	no member voted	0–11–0	1–0–0	no member voted
Ireland	2–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0	4–1–0	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Italy	8–0–0	3–0–0	17–0–0	no member voted	0–8–0	0–20–0	0–7–0	no member voted	no member voted
Lithuania	no member voted	1–0–0	2–0–0	0–1–0	0–3–0	0–1–0	no member voted	0–0–1	no member voted
Luxembourg	no member voted	1–0–0	1–0–0	1–0–0	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Latvia	no member voted	1–0–0	1–0–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted
Malta	no member voted	no member voted	3–0–0	no member voted	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Netherlands	no member voted	6–0–0	3–0–0	0–6–0	0–6–0	0–1–0	0–5–0	no member voted	no member voted
Poland	no member voted	no member voted	3–0–0	0–1–0	0–20–0	0–20–0	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–0–1
Portugal	1–0–0	no member voted	7–0–0	1–1–0	0–5–0	no member voted	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted
Romania	no member voted	no member voted	11–0–0	0–3–0	0–10–0	0–5–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0
Sweden	2–0–0	3–0–0	4–0–0	0–3–0	0–5–0	0–3–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovenia	no member voted	1–0–0	1–0–0	1–1–0	0–4–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovakia	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	0–5–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	6–0–0

Share for: 0–19 %20–39 %40–59 %60–79 %80–100 %

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
Country	For	Against
Belgium	0	1
Bulgaria	0	1
Cyprus	0	1
Czechia	0	3
Denmark	0	1
Estonia	0	1
Spain	0	2
France	0	4
Greece	1	0
Croatia	0	1
Italy	0	20
Lithuania	0	1
Latvia	0	3
Netherlands	0	1
Poland	0	20
Romania	0	5
Sweden	0	3

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 649 members

No vote recorded, 70

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 70 members

Name · group that day · country

Adnan DIBRANI group that day: S&D · Sweden
Adrian-George AXINIA group that day: ECR · Romania
Aldo PATRICIELLO group that day: Patriots · Italy
Alessandro ZAN group that day: S&D · Italy
Alma EZCURRA ALMANSA group that day: EPP · Spain
Ana Catarina MENDES group that day: S&D · Portugal
Anja HAZEKAMP group that day: The Left · Netherlands
Annalisa CORRADO group that day: S&D · Italy
Anouk VAN BRUG group that day: Renew · Netherlands
Antonio DECARO group that day: S&D · Italy
Arash SAEIDI group that day: The Left · France
Benedetta SCUDERI group that day: Greens · Italy
Billy KELLEHER group that day: Renew · Ireland
Carlo CICCIOLI group that day: ECR · Italy
Christine SCHNEIDER group that day: EPP · Germany
Dainius ŽALIMAS group that day: Renew · Lithuania
Delara BURKHARDT group that day: S&D · Germany
Dennis RADTKE group that day: EPP · Germany
Diana RIBA I GINER group that day: Greens · Spain
Emma FOURREAU group that day: The Left · France
Fernando NAVARRETE ROJAS group that day: EPP · Spain
Galato ALEXANDRAKI group that day: ECR · Greece
Hanna GRONKIEWICZ-WALTZ group that day: EPP · Poland
Hélder SOUSA SILVA group that day: EPP · Portugal
Irene MONTERO group that day: The Left · Spain
Isabel SERRA SÁNCHEZ group that day: The Left · Spain
Jagna MARCZUŁAJTIS-WALCZAK group that day: EPP · Poland
Jana TOOM group that day: Renew · Estonia
João OLIVEIRA group that day: The Left · Portugal
Johan VAN OVERTVELDT group that day: ECR · Belgium
Jutta PAULUS group that day: Greens · Germany
Kostas PAPADAKIS group that day: No group · Greece
Kris VAN DIJCK group that day: ECR · Belgium
Lara WOLTERS group that day: S&D · Netherlands
Letizia MORATTI group that day: EPP · Italy
Ľudovít ÓDOR group that day: Renew · Slovakia
Lynn BOYLAN group that day: The Left · Ireland
Majdouline SBAI group that day: Greens · France
Marco TARQUINIO group that day: S&D · Italy
Maria OHISALO group that day: Greens · Finland
Maria WALSH group that day: EPP · Ireland
Mario MANTOVANI group that day: ECR · Italy
Michał WAWRYKIEWICZ group that day: EPP · Poland
Mimmo LUCANO group that day: The Left · Italy
Miriam LEXMANN group that day: EPP · Slovakia
Nathalie LOISEAU group that day: Renew · France
Nicolae ȘTEFĂNUȚĂ group that day: Greens · Romania
Norbert LINS group that day: EPP · Germany
Ondřej KNOTEK group that day: Patriots · Czechia
Pascal CANFIN group that day: Renew · France
Pasquale TRIDICO group that day: The Left · Italy
Paulo DO NASCIMENTO CABRAL group that day: EPP · Portugal
Pernando BARRENA ARZA group that day: The Left · Spain
Péter MAGYAR group that day: EPP · Hungary
Raphaël GLUCKSMANN group that day: S&D · France
Regina DOHERTY group that day: EPP · Ireland
Rima HASSAN group that day: The Left · France
Roberta METSOLA group that day: EPP · Malta
Romana TOMC group that day: EPP · Slovenia
Ruggero RAZZA group that day: ECR · Italy
Sebastiaan STÖTELER group that day: Patriots · Netherlands
Sebastian TYNKKYNEN group that day: ECR · Finland
Sigrid FRIIS group that day: Renew · Denmark
Sophie WILMÈS group that day: Renew · Belgium
Stanisław TYSZKA group that day: ESN · Poland
Stefano CAVEDAGNA group that day: ECR · Italy
Tsvetelina PENKOVA group that day: S&D · Bulgaria
Udo BULLMANN group that day: S&D · Germany
Waldemar TOMASZEWSKI group that day: ECR · Lithuania
Yvan VEROUGSTRAETE group that day: Renew · Belgium

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
19 Sept 2024	Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 6 The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in Cuba	Amendment	231 for, 326 against, 58 abstained Rejected	For 38 %	Requested by Greens	r · shared0.90 560 voters
18 Jun 2026	Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 4 Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba	Amendment	215 for, 313 against, 38 abstained Rejected	For 38 %	Requested by Greens	r · shared0.89 505 voters
1 Apr 2025	Amendment 33, adding text after recital 28 Macro-financial assistance to Egypt	Amendment	232 for, 389 against, 49 abstained Rejected	For 35 %	Requested by Greens	r · shared0.88 607 voters

Show 7 more

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
17 Sept 2026	Amendment 61, adding text after recital C The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders	Amendment	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained Rejected	For 37 %	Requested by The Left	r · shared0.88 519 voters
19 Sept 2024	Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 6 The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in Cuba	Amendment	219 for, 357 against, 41 abstained Rejected	For 35 %	Requested by Greens	r · shared0.88 562 voters
12 Feb 2026	Recital D — part 2 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy	Split vote	220 for, 319 against, 39 abstained Rejected	For 38 %	Requested by The Left, S&D	r · shared0.87 523 voters
22 Jan 2026	Amendment 5, adding text after recital A Presidential elections in Honduras, the non-recognition of the outcome by the incumbent administration and the attacks on opposition members of the National Assembly	Amendment	215 for, 362 against, 39 abstained Rejected	For 35 %	Requested by The Left	r · shared0.87 561 voters
18 Jun 2026	Amendment 13, adding text after recital A Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba	Amendment	238 for, 315 against, 9 abstained Rejected	For 42 %	Requested by Greens	r · shared0.87 501 voters
18 Jun 2026	Amendment 14, adding text after recital F Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba	Amendment	217 for, 319 against, 31 abstained Rejected	For 38 %	Requested by S&D	r · shared0.87 506 voters
17 Sept 2026	Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 4 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders	Amendment	231 for, 350 against, 18 abstained Rejected	For 39 %	Requested by Greens	r · shared0.87 531 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Another vote on this decision

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Decision Public procurement Resolution · report by Piotr Müller 9 Sept 2025 Adopted

Other votes on this decision

Vote Public procurement — Amendment 42, adding text after paragraph 2 Roll-call vote · 9 Sept 2025 9 Sept 2025
Vote Public procurement — Paragraph 3 — part 1 Roll-call vote · 9 Sept 2025 9 Sept 2025
Vote Public procurement — Paragraph 3 — part 2 Roll-call vote · 9 Sept 2025 9 Sept 2025
Vote Public procurement — Amendment 3 to paragraph 4 Roll-call vote · 9 Sept 2025 9 Sept 2025
Vote Public procurement — Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 6 Roll-call vote · 9 Sept 2025 9 Sept 2025
Vote Public procurement — Paragraph 8 — part 2 Roll-call vote · 9 Sept 2025 9 Sept 2025
Vote Public procurement — Amendment 5 to paragraph 11 Roll-call vote · 9 Sept 2025 9 Sept 2025
Vote Public procurement — Paragraph 13 — part 2 Roll-call vote · 9 Sept 2025 9 Sept 2025
Vote Public procurement — Amendment 7 to paragraph 36 Roll-call vote · 9 Sept 2025 9 Sept 2025
Vote Public procurement — Amendment 8 to paragraph 39 Roll-call vote · 9 Sept 2025 9 Sept 2025

See all

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178651
Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 September 2025 (European Parliament)
Results of votes, sitting of 9 September 2025 (European Parliament)
Data source: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-09
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 24, after paragraph 63 — Public procurement”. Vote, 9 September 2025. votingId 178651, reference 2024/2103(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178651 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 9 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-09, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-09-09/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).

BibTeX

@misc{epw-vote-2025-09-09-178651,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 24, after paragraph 63 — Public procurement}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-09-09},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178651}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178651},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 178651, reference 2024/2103(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-09 (CC BY 4.0)}
}