Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendments 399 + 412 (voted as one) to article 3, paragraph 1, point 15

Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles

Vote
Amendments 399 + 412 (voted as one) to article 3, paragraph 1, point 15
Decision
No. 1 of the sitting of 9 Sept 2025
Result
168 for · 445 against · 36 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
9 September 2025, 13:42
More facts (6)
Position
vote 21 of 67 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
A10-0158/2025 - Jens Gieseke, Paulius Saudargas - Article 3, § 1, point 15 - Am 399= 412=
Text
Report A-10-2025-0158
Dossier
2023/0284(COD)
Vote id
178575
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 168 for, 445 against, 36 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 26 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 34Abst. 0No vote 12 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 48Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 125Abst. 0No vote 11 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 65Abst. 0No vote 10 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 11Against 150Abst. 12No vote 15 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.80
ECRFor 49Against 0Abst. 19No vote 11 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.58
PatriotsFor 82Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 5Against 18Abst. 3No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.54
No groupFor 21Against 5Abst. 2No vote 2 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria050
Belgium030
Bulgaria060
Cyprus020
Czechia050
Germany0290
Denmark020
Estonia020
Spain0200
Finland040
France006
Greece070
Croatia060
Hungary006
Ireland020
Italy620
Lithuania030
Luxembourg020
Latvia020
Malta020
Netherlands060
Poland0200
Portugal050
Romania0100
Sweden050
Slovenia500

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 649 members

No vote recorded, 70

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 70 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
19 Jun 2025Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 1 Electricity grids: the backbone of the EU energy systemAmendment160 for, 404 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Renew, Membersr · shared0.91 531 voters
22 Oct 2025Amendment 111, adding text after paragraph 10 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment183 for, 456 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 592 voters
22 Oct 2025Amendment 114 to paragraph 22 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment178 for, 466 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 600 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 May 2026Amendment 2 to paragraph 1, point v Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAmendment189 for, 444 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 580 voters
9 Jul 2025Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 33 Product safety and regulatory compliance in e-commerce and non-EU importsAmendment157 for, 493 against, 39 abstained Rejected For 23 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.90 627 voters
8 May 2025Amendments 275 + 298 (voted as one) to Article 20 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment173 for, 386 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.90 519 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 4 to paragraph 1 Electricity grids: the backbone of the EU energy systemAmendment170 for, 396 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Renew, Membersr · shared0.90 529 voters
8 May 2025Amendments 274 + 297 (voted as one) to Article 19 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment175 for, 386 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.89 516 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 26 to paragraph 24 Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal marketAmendment86 for, 345 against, 51 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.89 436 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 15 Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal marketAmendment137 for, 326 against, 22 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.88 438 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178575
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendments 399 + 412 (voted as one) to article 3, paragraph 1, point 15 — Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles”. Vote, 9 September 2025. votingId 178575, reference 2023/0284(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178575 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 9 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-09, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-09-09/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-09-09-178575,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendments 399 + 412 (voted as one) to article 3, paragraph 1, point 15 — Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-09-09},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178575}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178575},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 178575, reference 2023/0284(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-09 (CC BY 4.0)}
}