Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 5, after paragraph 26

Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness

Vote
Amendment 5, after paragraph 26
Result
200 for · 417 against · 29 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
10 July 2025, 13:14
More facts (6)
Position
vote 11 of 22 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Members
Official label
A10-0123/2025 – Hildegard Bentele – After § 26 – Am 5
Vote id
178125
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 200 for, 417 against, 29 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 31 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 24Abst. 9No vote 13 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.59
GreensFor 0Against 51Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 117Abst. 0No vote 19 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 1Against 67Abst. 0No vote 7 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 17Against 149Abst. 10No vote 12 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.77
ECRFor 62Against 4Abst. 6No vote 7 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.79
PatriotsFor 78Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 25Against 1Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 17Against 4Abst. 4No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria200
Cyprus001
Czechia200
Germany502
France010
Greece130
Luxembourg100
Romania200
Slovakia401

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 646 members

No vote recorded, 73

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 73 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Jun 2026Amendment 6 to paragraph 14 Recruitment of children by organised crimeAmendment181 for, 379 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.91 515 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 4 to paragraph 16 The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basinsAmendment197 for, 444 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.91 577 voters
18 Dec 2025Amendment 3, adding text after recital C Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regimeAmendment197 for, 378 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 526 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Mar 2025Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR GroupOther110 for, 309 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 26 %r · shared0.91 392 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 35 Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience FacilityAmendment199 for, 446 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 589 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 3 to recital F The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basinsAmendment198 for, 440 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.91 576 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 4, adding text after recital A The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportAmendment217 for, 428 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by S&D, Membersr · shared0.90 588 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 76 to paragraph 73, after point iii Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment190 for, 449 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 589 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 14 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAmendment204 for, 432 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 574 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 24 to paragraph 33 Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience FacilityAmendment184 for, 454 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 593 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 8 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 5, after paragraph 26 — Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness”. Vote, 10 July 2025. votingId 178125, reference 2025/2008(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-07-10/178125 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 July 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 July 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-07-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-07-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-07-10-178125,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 5, after paragraph 26 — Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-07-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-07-10/178125}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-07-10/178125},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 178125, reference 2025/2008(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-07-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}