Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Recital G — part 2

Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility

Vote
Recital G — part 2
Result
418 for · 200 against · 35 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
18 June 2025, 13:16
More facts (6)
Position
vote 78 of 87 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN · split vote: ESN, Patriots
Official label
A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – Recital G/2
Vote id
177321
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 418 for, 200 against, 35 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 64 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “whereas the Council has yet to adopt the adjusted basket of new own resources proposed by the Commission, which raises concerns about the viability of the repayment of the debt undertaken under NGEU;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 31Against 5Abst. 4No vote 6 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.66
GreensFor 52Against 0Abst. 0No vote 1 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 121Against 1Abst. 3No vote 11 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
RenewFor 58Against 8Abst. 0No vote 9 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.82
EPPFor 150Against 10Abst. 6No vote 22 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.86
ECRFor 0Against 57Abst. 15No vote 7 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.69
PatriotsFor 0Against 78Abst. 0No vote 7 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 27Abst. 0No vote 0 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 6Against 14Abst. 7No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium200
Czechia100
Germany1500
Denmark300
Spain400
Finland100
France500
Croatia100
Italy400
Lithuania100
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands600
Romania100
Sweden300
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 653 members

No vote recorded, 66

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 66 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
11 Mar 2026Final vote — text as a whole European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026Final404 for, 208 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 64 %r · shared0.90 573 voters
30 Apr 2026Paragraph 7 — part 2 The need for targeted criminal provisions and platforms’ responsibility to effectively address cyberbullying and online harassmentSplit vote380 for, 173 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.89 506 voters
21 May 2026Paragraph 18 — part 2 The need to reduce work-related fatalitiesSplit vote303 for, 165 against, 5 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by The Left, Patriotsr · shared0.89 432 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 May 2025Paragraph 51 — part 2 2023 and 2024 reports on TürkiyeSplit vote426 for, 192 against, 4 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.88 574 voters
22 Jan 2026Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 3 European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructureAmendment426 for, 180 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriots, Renewr · shared0.88 578 voters
20 Jan 2026Paragraph 2 — part 2 Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member StatesSplit vote419 for, 193 against, 37 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.88 593 voters
23 Jan 2025Paragraph 10 — part 1 Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against UkraineSplit vote415 for, 164 against, 32 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.87 562 voters
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 92 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Separate vote427 for, 195 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.87 577 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 39 — part 2 Establishing the Temporary Decarbonisation FundAmendment439 for, 207 against, 22 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.87 603 voters
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Final416 for, 190 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 67 %r · shared0.87 565 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Recital G — part 2 — Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility”. Vote, 18 June 2025. votingId 177321, reference 2024/2085(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-18/177321 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 18 June 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-18-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 18 June 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-18-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-06-18, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-06-18/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-06-18-177321,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Recital G — part 2 — Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-06-18},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-18/177321}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-18/177321},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 177321, reference 2024/2085(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-18-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-18-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-06-18 (CC BY 4.0)}
}