Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 99 — part 2

The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report

Vote
Paragraph 99 — part 2
Decision
No. 5 of the sitting of 18 Jun 2025
Result
297 for · 334 against · 22 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
18 June 2025, 13:24
More facts (6)
Position
vote 42 of 50 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Members · split vote: Members
Official label
A10-0100/2025 – Ana Catarina Mendes – § 99/2
Text
Report A-10-2025-0100
Dossier
2024/2078(INI)
Vote id
177221
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 297 for, 334 against, 22 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 45 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “those words”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 37Against 1Abst. 3No vote 5 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.85
GreensFor 51Against 1Abst. 0No vote 1 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 123Against 1Abst. 0No vote 12 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 65Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 18Against 139Abst. 8No vote 23 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.76
ECRFor 1Against 71Abst. 2No vote 5 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
PatriotsFor 0Against 78Abst. 0No vote 7 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 27Abst. 0No vote 0 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 2Against 16Abst. 9No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Cyprus001
Germany300
Denmark100
Spain400
Finland300
France900
Greece300
Ireland200
Italy900
Portugal110
Sweden002

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 653 members

No vote recorded, 66

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 66 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 155 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment282 for, 334 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.94 573 voters
12 Feb 2026Separate vote on recital P Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSeparate vote267 for, 261 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 49 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.91 502 voters
9 Jul 2025Request for urgent procedure Final vote European Climate LawProcedural300 for, 379 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 44 %r · shared0.91 631 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
28 Apr 2026Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 25 Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2024Amendment277 for, 349 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.91 586 voters
13 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 68 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Separate vote262 for, 309 against, 33 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by Renew, S&Dr · shared0.90 555 voters
29 Apr 2026Recital AP — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote273 for, 337 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greens, EPPr · shared0.90 567 voters
13 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 83 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Separate vote272 for, 320 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.90 561 voters
8 Oct 2025Amendment 143 to Article 1 Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chainAmendment282 for, 360 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.90 590 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.90 540 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 60 2023 and 2024 reports on MontenegroAmendment278 for, 349 against, 23 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.90 646 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-18/177221
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 99 — part 2 — The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report”. Vote, 18 June 2025. votingId 177221, reference 2024/2078(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-18/177221 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 18 June 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-18-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 18 June 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-18-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-06-18, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-06-18/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-06-18-177221,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 99 — part 2 — The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-06-18},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-18/177221}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-18/177221},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 177221, reference 2024/2078(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-18-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-18-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-06-18 (CC BY 4.0)}
}