Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 1, after paragraph 44

Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Court of Justice of the European Union

Vote
Amendment 1, after paragraph 44
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 7 May 2025
Result
187 for · 450 against · 21 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
7 May 2025, 13:44
More facts (6)
Position
vote 8 of 9 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN
Official label
A10-0050/2025 – Cristian Terheş – After § 44 – Am 1
Text
Report A-10-2025-0050
Dossier
2024/2022(DEC)
Vote id
175682
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 187 for, 450 against, 21 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 28 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 4Against 30Abst. 3No vote 9 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.72
GreensFor 0Against 49Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 127Abst. 0No vote 9 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 1Against 69Abst. 0No vote 5 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 6Against 164Abst. 2No vote 16 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
ECRFor 73Against 1Abst. 1No vote 5 of 80Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 69Against 0Abst. 13No vote 3 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.76
ESNFor 22Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 26Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 12Against 10Abst. 2No vote 6 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group, Volker SCHNURRBUSCH changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria020
Cyprus001
Czechia200
Germany711
France010
Greece200
Romania100
Slovakia060

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 658 members

No vote recorded, 61

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 61 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 May 2025Amendment 257 to recital 15 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment180 for, 392 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 564 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 258, adding text after recital 23 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment179 for, 387 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 558 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 259, adding text after recital 26 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment178 for, 385 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 555 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
25 Nov 2025Amendment 15 to paragraph 13 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedAmendment187 for, 444 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.94 594 voters
26 Mar 2026Proposal to vote on amendments Combating corruptionProcedural179 for, 446 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 28 %r · shared0.94 586 voters
10 Mar 2026Proposal to vote on amendments Harmonising certain aspects of insolvency lawProcedural164 for, 447 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 27 %r · shared0.93 561 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 16 to paragraph 17 Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience FacilityAmendment188 for, 457 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 605 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 1 to paragraph 4 The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) ActAmendment161 for, 428 against, 21 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 557 voters
25 Nov 2025Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 2 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedAmendment182 for, 446 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 592 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 11 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportAmendment192 for, 450 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.93 604 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 6 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-07/175682
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 1, after paragraph 44 — Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Court of Justice of the European Union”. Vote, 7 May 2025. votingId 175682, reference 2024/2022(DEC). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-07/175682 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 7 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-07-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 7 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-07-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-07, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-05-07/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-05-07-175682,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 1, after paragraph 44 — Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Court of Justice of the European Union}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-05-07},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-07/175682}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-07/175682},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 175682, reference 2024/2022(DEC). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-07-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-07-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-07 (CC BY 4.0)}
}