Skip to content

Decision

Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Court of Justice of the European Union

Effect
Discharge decision adopted
Result
541 for · 97 against · 26 abstained roll call
Date
7 May 2025, 13:43–13:44
Kind
Budget decision
More facts (10)
Margin
by an overwhelming majority
Counts are for
the proposal for a discharge decision
Source
Committee report by Cristian Terheş
Topics
EU budget & funds Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
9 votes · 6 roll calls · 4 amendments
Requested by
S&D (1 roll call, 1 split vote) · ECR (1 roll call, 1 split vote) · Patriots (1 separate vote) · ESN (1 roll call)
Final vote
175675
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 541 for, 97 against, 26 abstained (roll call).

Discharge decision adopted by an overwhelming majority.

Parliament voted on its discharge decision for this budget; whether discharge was granted, refused or postponed is set out in the report.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 4 amendments (2 adopted, 2 rejected) and 3 parts of the text voted on separately (1 adopted, 2 lapsed).

Backed by The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP and ECR; opposed by Patriots and ESN.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 40Against 0Abst. 1No vote 5 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 48Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 128Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 68Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 173Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 64Against 7Abst. 5No vote 4 of 80Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.76
PatriotsFor 0Against 63Abst. 19No vote 3 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.65
ESNFor 0Against 22Abst. 0No vote 4 of 26Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 20Against 5Abst. 1No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group, Volker SCHNURRBUSCH changed group.

Voted against their group, 32

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria136010.53
Belgium153040.75
Bulgaria133010.72
Cyprus6000—
Czechia102720.29
Germany71141100.74
Denmark121110.79
Estonia6010—
Spain480660.83
Finland121020.88
France4534020.35
Greece154200.57
Croatia100021.00
Hungary911010.33
Ireland130011.00
Italy657040.85
Lithuania91010.85
Luxembourg5001—
Latvia6102—
Malta5001—
Netherlands240610.70
Poland453050.91
Portugal152130.75
Romania301020.95
Sweden182100.79
Slovenia8001—
Slovakia131010.89

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 664 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. Speeches: how many times they took the floor. Final vote: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Roberta METSOLA MaltaEPPSpeeches17 May 2025 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded

All votes on this decision, 9

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Final vote A10-0050/2025 – Cristian Terheş – Proposal for a decision Roll call541 for, 97 against, 26 abstained Adopted
2Amendment 2 to paragraph 11 A10-0050/2025 – Cristian Terheş – § 11 – Am 2 Roll call353 for, 292 against, 18 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D, ECR
3Separate vote on paragraph 11 Show of hands LapsedRequested byseparate: Patriots
Show the other 8 votesShow the other 6 votes
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
2Amendment 2 to paragraph 11 A10-0050/2025 – Cristian Terheş – § 11 – Am 2 Roll call353 for, 292 against, 18 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D, ECR
3Separate vote on paragraph 11 Show of hands LapsedRequested byseparate: Patriots
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
4Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 11 — part 1 A10-0050/2025 – Cristian Terheş – After § 11 – Am 3/1 Part voted on: “Notes that Article 4(2) of the Treaty on European Union states that “The Union shall respect the equality of Member States before the Treaties as well as their national identities, inherent in their fundamental structures, political and constitutional, inclusive of regional and local self-government. It shall respect their essential State functions [...]”;”Roll call423 for, 81 against, 147 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: S&D, ECR; split: S&D, ECR
5Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 11 — part 2 A10-0050/2025 – Cristian Terheş – After § 11 – Am 3/2 Part voted on: “emphasises that supremacy of national constitutions remains the absolute principle which governs the relationship between the constitutions of the Member States and Union law;”Roll call212 for, 419 against, 12 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: S&D, ECR; split: S&D, ECR
6Vote on text inserted after paragraph 11 Show of hands Lapsed
7Separate vote on paragraph 12 Show of hands AdoptedRequested byseparate: Patriots
8Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 44 A10-0050/2025 – Cristian Terheş – After § 44 – Am 1 Roll call187 for, 450 against, 21 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN
9Final vote — text as a whole A10-0050/2025 – Cristian Terheş – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Roll call485 for, 113 against, 61 abstained Adopted

Roll calls requested by S&D, ECR, ESN · split votes by S&D, ECR · separate votes by Patriots.

Text

The text voted on.

Report A-10-2025-0050

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament granted discharge to the Court of Justice of the European Union for implementing its 2023 budget, approving the spending.

The decision covers the Court's budget under the EU's general budget for that financial year.

Parliament also adopted a resolution with observations on the Court's financial management and operations.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament grants discharge to the Registrar of the Court of Justice for the 2023 budget and adopts a resolution with observations on the Court's financial management, performance, and governance.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2024/2022(DEC) · Discharge procedure

2023 discharge: General budget of the EU - Court of Justice of the European Union

Completed: published in the Official Journal on 8 October 2025 and now EU law.

Show the 5 steps of the dossier
  1. Referred to committee · 17 September 2024 (done)
  2. Committee work · Report adopted 18 March 2025 (done)
  3. Tabled for plenary · 1 April 2025 (done)
  4. Plenary vote · Adopted 7 May 2025 (done)
  5. Parliament’s position · Final (done)

Lead committee: CONT · Rapporteur: Cristian TERHEŞ (ECR)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 21 connections: Running issue: Annual budget discharge procedure · Other decisions of the part-session on CONT dossiers · Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Running issue: Annual budget discharge procedure

Other decisions of the part-session on CONT dossiers

See all: Other decisions of the part-session on CONT dossiers

Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Court of Justice of the European Union”. Decision, 7 May 2025. votingId 175675, document A-10-2025-0050, reference 2024/2022(DEC). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-05-07/6 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 7 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-07-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 7 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-07-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-07, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-05-07/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2025-05-07-6,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Court of Justice of the European Union}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-05-07},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-05-07/6}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2025-05-07/6},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 175675, document A-10-2025-0050, reference 2024/2022(DEC). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-07-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-07-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-07 (CC BY 4.0)}
}