Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 16, after paragraph 68

White paper on the future of European defence

Vote
Amendment 16, after paragraph 68
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 12 Mar 2025
Result
208 for · 400 against · 70 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
12 March 2025, 13:09
More facts (6)
Position
vote 134 of 194 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens
Official label
RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 68 – Am 16
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0151
Dossier
2025/2565(RSP)
Vote id
172817
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 208 for, 400 against, 70 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 31 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 29Against 14Abst. 1No vote 2 of 46Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.49
GreensFor 50Against 0Abst. 1No vote 2 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 120Against 10Abst. 3No vote 3 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.85
RenewFor 4Against 66Abst. 0No vote 5 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.91
EPPFor 1Against 175Abst. 0No vote 12 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 1Against 16Abst. 54No vote 9 of 80Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.64
PatriotsFor 0Against 77Abst. 5No vote 4 of 86Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.91
ESNFor 0Against 22Abst. 1No vote 3 of 26Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
No groupFor 3Against 20Abst. 5No vote 1 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

S&D members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium400
Bulgaria200
Cyprus100
Germany1400
Denmark300
Estonia200
Spain2000
Finland200
France1300
Greece300
Croatia300
Hungary200
Ireland010
Italy2000
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Malta003
Netherlands400
Poland300
Portugal800
Romania640
Sweden050
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 678 members

No vote recorded, 41

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 41 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Mar 2025Amendment 26 to paragraph 23 Continuing the unwavering EU support for Ukraine, after three years of Russia’s war of aggressionAmendment219 for, 421 against, 24 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.84 656 voters
21 Oct 2024Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the Verts/ALE Group Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the Verts/ALE GroupOther164 for, 319 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 34 %r · shared0.83 458 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 2 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment203 for, 390 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.82 561 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendment 196 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment202 for, 428 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 607 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 215 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment211 for, 423 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 602 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 5 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment201 for, 390 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.82 562 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 69 to paragraph 13 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 549 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 219 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment201 for, 426 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 601 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 550 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 60, adding text after recital C The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 550 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172817
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 16, after paragraph 68 — White paper on the future of European defence”. Vote, 12 March 2025. votingId 172817, reference 2025/2565(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172817 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-03-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-03-12-172817,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 16, after paragraph 68 — White paper on the future of European defence}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-03-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172817}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172817},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 172817, reference 2025/2565(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}