Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 103 — part 2 to paragraph 46

White paper on the future of European defence

Vote
Amendment 103 — part 2 to paragraph 46
Result
316 for · 281 against · 58 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
12 March 2025, 13:02
More facts (6)
Position
vote 89 of 194 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR · split vote: S&D
Official label
RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 46 – Am 103/2
Vote id
172767
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 316 for, 281 against, 58 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 48 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “ensuring that critical capabilities, such as ammunition production, air defence systems and drone technologies, are also developed in frontline states, which have a direct understanding of operational needs;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 4Against 37Abst. 0No vote 5 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.85
GreensFor 42Against 0Abst. 3No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.90
S&DFor 28Against 100Abst. 3No vote 5 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.65
RenewFor 7Against 64Abst. 0No vote 4 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.85
EPPFor 153Against 5Abst. 7No vote 23 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.89
ECRFor 66Against 0Abst. 4No vote 10 of 80Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.91
PatriotsFor 13Against 54Abst. 16No vote 3 of 86Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.48
ESNFor 0Against 2Abst. 19No vote 5 of 26Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.86
No groupFor 3Against 19Abst. 6No vote 1 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria010
Belgium050
Bulgaria030
Germany070
Denmark220
Estonia110
Spain100
Finland030
France0120
Ireland060
Lithuania200
Latvia100
Netherlands070
Poland010
Portugal020
Romania030
Sweden030
Slovenia020
Slovakia060

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 655 members

No vote recorded, 64

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 64 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 May 2025Amendment 29, adding text after recital F Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023Amendment294 for, 261 against, 28 abstained Adopted For 50 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.71 528 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 119, adding text after paragraph 24 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024Amendment310 for, 341 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.68 609 voters
9 Oct 2025Paragraph 27 — part 2 United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructureSplit vote233 for, 272 against, 104 abstained Rejected For 38 %r · shared0.68 554 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Oct 2025Paragraph 27 — part 3 United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructureSplit vote204 for, 380 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 34 %r · shared0.66 544 voters
28 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2024Final231 for, 389 against, 33 abstained Rejected For 35 %r · shared0.61 587 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 1 to paragraph 45 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Court of AuditorsAmendment258 for, 323 against, 80 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.59 606 voters
22 May 2025Amendment 30, adding text after paragraph 2 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023Amendment397 for, 139 against, 55 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.58 537 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 286 to recital 24 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment294 for, 337 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.58 585 voters
19 Sept 2024Amendment 25 to citation 2 Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member StatesAmendment238 for, 303 against, 75 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.58 567 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 2 to paragraph 47 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Court of AuditorsAmendment259 for, 325 against, 77 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.58 606 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 103 — part 2 to paragraph 46 — White paper on the future of European defence”. Vote, 12 March 2025. votingId 172767, reference 2025/2565(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172767 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-03-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-03-12-172767,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 103 — part 2 to paragraph 46 — White paper on the future of European defence}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-03-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172767}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172767},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 172767, reference 2025/2565(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}