Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 96, after paragraph 47

White paper on the future of European defence

Vote
Amendment 96, after paragraph 47
Result
203 for · 448 against · 13 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
12 March 2025, 13:02
More facts (6)
Position
vote 92 of 194 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN
Official label
RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 47 – Am 96
Vote id
172771
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 203 for, 448 against, 13 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 31 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 2Against 37Abst. 2No vote 5 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.85
GreensFor 3Against 48Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.91
S&DFor 6Against 125Abst. 0No vote 5 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
RenewFor 1Against 68Abst. 0No vote 6 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 6Against 163Abst. 4No vote 15 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.91
ECRFor 66Against 0Abst. 3No vote 11 of 80Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
PatriotsFor 82Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 86Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 22Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 26Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 15Against 7Abst. 4No vote 3 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium020
Cyprus010
Germany040
Spain040
Finland030
France080
Greece030
Ireland210
Italy090
Netherlands010
Portugal010
Sweden002

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 664 members

No vote recorded, 55

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 55 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 12 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment193 for, 428 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.95 574 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 17 to paragraph 1, after point o Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAmendment205 for, 437 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.94 592 voters
18 Dec 2025Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 53 Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regimeAmendment183 for, 388 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 531 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Jun 2025Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 47 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportAmendment194 for, 437 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by S&D, Membersr · shared0.94 601 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 22 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment195 for, 420 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.93 571 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 3 to paragraph 77 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment196 for, 422 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.93 573 voters
22 May 2025Amendment 28, adding text after paragraph 19 — part 3 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023Amendment192 for, 374 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Patriots, ESNr · shared0.93 534 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 3 to recital F The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basinsAmendment198 for, 440 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 591 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 32 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment182 for, 415 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 551 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 5 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Amendment207 for, 410 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 574 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 96, after paragraph 47 — White paper on the future of European defence”. Vote, 12 March 2025. votingId 172771, reference 2025/2565(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172771 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-03-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-03-12-172771,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 96, after paragraph 47 — White paper on the future of European defence}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-03-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172771}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172771},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 172771, reference 2025/2565(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}