Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 52 — part 1, after paragraph 14

White paper on the future of European defence

Vote
Amendment 52 — part 1, after paragraph 14
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 12 Mar 2025
Result
216 for · 399 against · 48 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
12 March 2025, 12:56
More facts (6)
Position
vote 45 of 194 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left · split vote: S&D
Official label
RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – After § 14 – Am 52/1
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0151
Dossier
2025/2565(RSP)
Vote id
172714
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 216 for, 399 against, 48 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 33 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Recalls the provisional measures ordered by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) regarding the application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip (South Africa v. Israel); stresses the need for international law to be upheld and respected; calls on the Council and the Commission to ensure that the EU is in no way complicit in violations of international law, including under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide,”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 18Against 1Abst. 30No vote 4 of 53Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.42
S&DFor 117Against 8Abst. 3No vote 8 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.87
RenewFor 8Against 59Abst. 1No vote 7 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.80
EPPFor 4Against 168Abst. 3No vote 13 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
ECRFor 4Against 63Abst. 2No vote 11 of 80Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.87
PatriotsFor 5Against 77Abst. 0No vote 4 of 86Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.91
ESNFor 1Against 19Abst. 4No vote 2 of 26Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.69
No groupFor 16Against 4Abst. 5No vote 4 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria030
Czechia010
Germany0120
France010
Hungary010
Lithuania001
Poland003
Slovakia110

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 663 members

No vote recorded, 56

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 56 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
11 Sept 2025Amendment 49, adding text after paragraph 1 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solutionAmendment177 for, 389 against, 21 abstained Rejected For 30 %r · shared0.87 540 voters
11 Sept 2025Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 1 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solutionAmendment172 for, 379 against, 35 abstained Rejected For 29 %r · shared0.86 542 voters
11 Sept 2025Amendment 30, adding text after paragraph 1 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solutionAmendment179 for, 376 against, 36 abstained Rejected For 30 %r · shared0.86 545 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
11 Sept 2025Amendment 42, adding text after paragraph 1 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solutionAmendment199 for, 359 against, 32 abstained Rejected For 34 %r · shared0.86 545 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 17 to paragraph 64 Public procurementAmendment224 for, 420 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.86 599 voters
11 Sept 2025Amendment 43, adding text after paragraph 1 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solutionAmendment169 for, 390 against, 31 abstained Rejected For 29 %r · shared0.86 543 voters
19 Sept 2024Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 27 The devastating floods in central and eastern Europe, the loss of lives and the EU’s preparedness to act on such disasters exacerbated by climate changeAmendment222 for, 375 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 37 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.86 557 voters
11 Sept 2025Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 1 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solutionAmendment207 for, 363 against, 21 abstained Rejected For 35 %r · shared0.85 544 voters
18 May 2026Tuesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group — Israel’s air strikes in Lebanon Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group – Israel’s air strikes in LebanonOther181 for, 259 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 41 %r · shared0.85 414 voters
8 Jul 2025Amendment 5 to paragraph 34 EU-Greenland and Denmark Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement: Implementing Protocol 2025-2030 (Resolution)Amendment237 for, 436 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.85 628 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172714
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 52 — part 1, after paragraph 14 — White paper on the future of European defence”. Vote, 12 March 2025. votingId 172714, reference 2025/2565(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172714 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-03-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-03-12-172714,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 52 — part 1, after paragraph 14 — White paper on the future of European defence}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-03-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172714}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172714},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 172714, reference 2025/2565(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}